My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dolores 7.18.06 Minutes
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
Dolores 7.18.06 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:14:58 PM
Creation date
7/18/2007 1:57:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Southwest
Title
Minutes
Date
7/18/2006
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MEMO I <br /> <br />To: D-SJ-SM Basin Roundtable <br /> <br />From: John Porter <br /> <br />Date: 7/18/2007 <br /> <br />Re: IBee / summary / criteria & guidelines committee <br /> <br />Jenny and John, <br />My additions based on my notes are shown as changes. <br /> <br />Steve & Jenny & Lynn; <br />Based on my recollection and my sketchy notes, this is my 151 draft of the conclusions <br />we reached Tuesday. How far did I miss the target? <br /> <br />The term "projects" is used as a reference to any type of water activity, whether a study, <br />construction, environmental improvement, anything. <br /> <br />Following is a random bulleted summary of the C&R committee's discussion: The bold <br />text is the D-SJ-SM BRT's instruction regarding the specific issue. (based on my draft <br />conclusions ). <br />. Draft criteria as flexible as possible, yet provide sound guidance <br />o No specific guidance <br />. Strict adherence to statute would prevent granting preference to any class of <br />applicants (such as inability to pay) <br />o BRT believes that HB 1177 was meant for small projects that can not <br />afford to pay their own way. Suggested the money available be split <br />with a large portion being allocated and reserved for that basin's <br />projects - a "bank account" to be used as worthy projects are <br />formulated. <br />o If an entity can get a loan, it should not be eligible for SB 179 money <br />o This Basin will have to set its own criteria and priorities <br />o Individual BRT members may have to recuse themselves during <br />action on specific projects <br />. Leaned toward NOT equally dividing the money between the 9 BRTs. However, <br />do not favor granting on a "151 come / 1 51 served" basis <br />o See above paragraph <br />o Interest in having a budget for each basin, such as allocating half of <br />the $10 mil to the basins so the basins can conduct planning then half <br />of the money of competitive statewide. Without a budget the <br />roundtables can only be reactionary on projects rather than planning <br />to meet their needs. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.