Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />FOREWARD <br /> <br />Seasonal rainfall in Western Kansas in 2006 was below normal to various degrees <br />for most of the target area. Last year, roughly half of the target area counties fell back <br />into the drought while the other half continued an extended moist period going back to <br />2004. This year, the area had fallen back into the drought entirely for an extended period, <br />which spreads across at least half the United States. For a second year in a row, August <br />turned out to be the best month for rainfall as significant rains fell over much of western <br />Kansas with 64% of target area counties reporting above average rainfall. Also, for a <br />second year in a row, July turned out to be the driest month for the area with only 18% of <br />target area counties reporting a monthly rain surplus. Of course there were some <br />exceptions to this description at each reporting location, but for most of the target area, <br />this scenario fit the area fairly well. <br /> <br />Currently, we can only speculate as to the extent of hail damage sustained to the <br />target area this year. For many years, our program had received hail claim information <br />from a company in north-central Kansas. However, due to a sharp decline in subscribers <br />for the claim information, the company has suspended the dissemination of such <br />information. As a result, we have no information about the extent of hail damage <br />incurred on those who carry crop-hail insurance. Although hail claims alone are not <br />meant to be hard evidence to indicate overall hail reduction, our program used the data to <br />provide us with a fairly quick method of learning the relative amount of crop-hail damage <br />incurred within the target area. However, one could probably say with a fair degree of <br />confidence that crop-hail damage was probably lower than normal given the general lack <br />of storms due to the drought. <br />