My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00273
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:29:16 PM
Creation date
7/18/2007 11:59:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Evaluation of Winter Cloud Seeding Effects on Snow Water for the Colorado River
Prepared For
Southwestern Water Conservation District, Durango
Prepared By
Steven M. Hunter, Bureau of Reclaimation Technical Service Center
Date
7/11/2006
County
La Plata
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Target & Control Area dSWE <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.SJ..... <br />.I.C~ I <br />at.roc~J <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />o -.. <br />'" ,. <br />-Do; <br /> <br /> -~ ~LL :~~~~ <br />> . ,. ,. ". ". ,. . ,. ". U. U. ". ". 20. 22. "J <br />Co< Do; '"" "., ,.. ,.. ,.. ... "" "" ... w.. Me, U.' Mer !,la, W.. <br /> Dal.,2005-2OOI <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />! <br />~ .. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />02 <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />Hgure 3. Are.,1 iwemgt! values of 24 hr dSWE for the 5.tn Juan targl't are.' (r('d), l.onl' Cone <br />control ilreel (cyan), and the Uncompahgre control are.' (yellow). stratified by dale. Thl' datl's <br />cover the ~)('riods of sL'Cding UM' met the conl.,mination criteria. <br /> <br />variation in dSWE. The differences between target and control area dSWE arc ex.pressed as a <br />percentage of the target dSWE in Fig. 4. These values range between -71% (decrease in target) <br />and 17,537% (increase in target). The large positive values resulted primarily from dividing by <br />ncar-zero values in the control area (little total snow). Nevertheless, such large departures from <br />values expected from winter seeding (5-20%) arc indicative that Ihe s(,l'dinJ,t could nnt hl' <br />rl'SIJUnsihl1' ror Ihl'larJ,t1' calculated percl'lllal-:e dirrerences. <br /> <br />Indeed, maps of dSWE across the target and control areas generally show spatial variations of <br />dSWE on scales larger than those of the target and control areas. These variations suggest that <br />they arc due to difTerences in locations or trajectories of the stonns themselves. rather than any <br />signal from seeding. Take, for example, the case depicted by Fig. 5. A stmng cold front passed <br />through the area from the northwest, causing strong northwesterly winds to Ilow ups/opt> on the <br />north-south oriented mountains to the north of the target, producing light to moderate snow there. <br />Conversely, these winds wnuld have l1nwed downs/ope over the target area (suuth of the <br />Continental Divide), causing warming and drying. So in this case, the larger-scale <br />meteorological conditions controlled the snowf.111 (dSWE) spatial pattern. masking the seeding <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.