My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 13 South Platte Minutes
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
March 13 South Platte Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:15:52 PM
Creation date
7/18/2007 11:27:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
South Platte
Title
Minutes
Date
3/13/2007
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Sue: SWSI II findings of environmental/rec impact and needs will be <br />revisited; will look at statewide environmental/tech; flow requirements. . . <br /> <br />Bert Weaver: Do you include snow making in rec requirements? <br /> <br />Sue: Snow making looked as a demand, not on the recreational side. <br />Considered an industrial use; accounted for on the M&I side <br /> <br />Fred Walker: On page 2 of preliminary draft outline; section b: roundtable <br />will be asked for help in facilitating the interviews and information <br />sharing: this will be an opportunity for members of this Roundtable to <br />help; <br /> <br />Sue: Analysis only as good as information behind it. <br /> <br />Mike: Next draft will have budgets? <br /> <br />Harold: More work here that has been identified than we have funds for <br />There may be $100,000 over 15 months maximum; that is probably not <br />enough to do first four questions; we conclude that Republican River and <br />Upper States need to be studied; thus this will be out of basin account; so <br />we either don't do needs assessment or it comes out of basin account. Out <br />of water supply reserve account...maybe there. <br /> <br />Fred Walker: Would there be another way to approach this? <br /> <br />Sasha Charney: Maybe could be cross sharing with Metro Roundtable <br /> <br />Sue: Looking at about $300,000-400,000 price tag for all three scopes. <br />Metro has requested a little different look but yes perhaps could do cross <br />study. <br /> <br />Harold Evans: Are these unreasonable things to be asking for as part of <br />our needs assessment? <br /> <br />Sue: No, look at Yampa energy scope was scoped at 300,000 level joint <br />application with Colorado..so they went with 179 request for that. <br /> <br />Harold Evans: Next time statewide is September; basin wide is June. <br /> <br />Sue: Could package this with Metro and go statewide; ask Metro to go <br />with assessments out of basin account; <br /> <br />Bob Streeter: Please give us scope, costs and time line: completion of <br />projects. <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.