Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The 1 percent chance exceedence flow for the Gunnison River from Ohio Creek to Tomichi Creek, with a <br />drainage area of 1,012 square miles, is 10,200 cfs; whereas the 1 percent chance exceedence flow for <br />Tomichi Creek, with a drainage area of 1,061 square miles is significantly less at 2,540 cfs. The large <br />difference in flow values is due to the differences in topography between the two contributing watersheds. <br />The contributing watershed to the Gunnison River reach is dominated by rugged, mountainous terrain <br />subject to large amounts of snowfall. The watershed of T omichi Creek is primarily a high mountain valley <br />area, and while it still receives snowfall, the volume is significantly less than that of the Gunnison River <br />reach watershed. The lower elevation areas have higher temperatures and longer snowmelt runoff period <br />than the upper watersheds, which will hold snow longer and will have more rapid snowmelt runoff periods. <br />Both factors contribute to the large difference in the 1 percent chance exceedence flows for the two <br />reaches. <br /> <br />The results from the flood frequency analyses for the study reaches indicate logical trends in values that <br />increase in the downstream direction. The resulting flood flows for each reach are presented in Table 7.2. <br />This study provides the necessary flood flows to complete the hydraulic analyses for the FEMA FIS study <br />along each of the eight reaches for the associated flood events. <br /> <br />57 <br />