Laserfiche WebLink
<br />July 10,2006 <br /> <br />I3. Should the IBCC establish a working group to work with the three CWCB members? Should <br />the working group consist (~l three members? How should the working group members be <br />selected? <br /> <br />This has already been done. <br /> <br />I4. Should the IBCC have any role beyond the establishment of criteria and guidelines? <br /> <br />Yes. <br /> <br />I5. Should the IBCC have the responsibility (~l considering a water activity that involves more <br />than one roundtable within the framework (~l their Charter? <br /> <br />Yes. <br /> <br />I6. Should the CWCB have any additional roles or responsibilities? <br /> <br />No. <br /> <br />I7. What entities should be eligible for grants or loans fimn the account? If a wide range of <br />entities are eligible, should priority be given to some entities over others instead of, or in <br />addition to other priorities discussed above? <br /> <br />Requests are reviewed on case by case and roundtable should have approval/denial authority. <br />Yes. <br /> <br />Other Business <br />Randy See announced a 2006 Gunnison/Dolores Rivers Watershed Tour on August 17,2006. <br />An agenda was distributed. <br /> <br />A short discussion was held about room accommodations and it was decided to move back to <br />Jordan Room, if possible. <br /> <br />Next Meeting <br />The next meeting of the Gunnison Basin Roundtable will be August 7, 2006. <br /> <br />Ad iourn <br />There being no further business to come before the Roundtable, the meeting adjourned at <br />7:55 p.m. <br /> <br />Mike Berry, Recorder <br /> <br />6 <br />