Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Union has already solicited work with a construction firm for purposes of developing a cost <br />estimate for excavation and grading of the Mercure #1 recharge site. These costs are reflected <br />in Table 2 and are used to estimate expected excavation costs for the additional recharge sites. <br />The ultimate storage capacity of each recharge site will depend on the specific conditions and <br />overall effectiveness of the site. Initially, Union will most likely develop recharge structures with <br />a smaller capacity than the capacity noted in Table 2. However, in order to develop the probable <br />cost of the recharge project, the excavation costs were estimated based on knowledge of the <br />site and the amount of surface area that can be dedicated to a recharge pond. Capacity values <br />reflected in the probable cost estimate have not specifically been determined at each recharge <br />site. <br /> <br />Union Ditch Company has estimated between $245,100 and $325,725 for near term (calendar <br />year 2004 and 2005) excavation, flow measurement structures (flumes or meters), new <br />headgate structures, and monitoring and reporting measurement equipment (SCADA) 1. As with <br />other recharge structure excavations, much is learned about the benefits and operational <br />characteristics of a particular structure through the actual real-time use of that structure. <br />Operational data, to be evaluated by the Company and Aqua Engineering, will be used to <br />determine costs and benefits associated with potential enlargement of a site or potential <br />excavation of a new site or sites. Four sites are identified within this feasibility study as priority <br />sites based on computer model runs and stream depletion factors. A project of this type, quite <br />different many construction projects, requires some flexibility to respond to experience gained <br />through initial operations. It is anticipated that funds will be drawn on an as needed basis and <br />based on data to be collected and reported before monies are expended. <br /> <br />Implementation Schedule <br /> <br />Union and the probable construction firm have developed the rough dimensions of the Mercure <br />#1 site. In addition, Union has begun a more detailed exploration of the soil conditions at the <br />site. Union plans to begin and complete the construction on this site during the spring of 2004. <br />Throughout the remainder of 2004, Union will operate, monitor, and evaluate the Mercure #1 for <br />purposes of deciding which site to develop next (or possibly enlarge the Mercure #1 site). In <br />order to allow time for monitoring and evaluation, Union does not expect to begin construction of <br />addition recharge sites until the fall of 2004 and spring of 2005. <br /> <br />Implementation Considerations <br /> <br />Entities that are, or may be, involved in the design, construction, and financing of the project <br />include: <br /> <br />Union Ditch Company: financing and project management <br />Aqua Engineering, Inc: design and construction observation <br />Rocky Mountain Construction: excavation and construction <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB): financing <br /> <br />The Union Ditch Company will be the lead for the financing, design, and construction of the <br />project and will be the entity entering into contracts and agreements with the various entities for <br />the services provided by each. <br /> <br />1 SCADA - Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition <br /> <br />Union Ditch Company <br />Recharge Project Feasibility Study <br />March 2004 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />