Laserfiche WebLink
2) Completion of alternative replacement siphon pipeline evaluations <br />given different piping materials and configurations; <br />3) Contacts and meetings with pipe manufacturers/suppliers in <br />Denver area and from out-of-state; <br />4) Estimation of project engineering design costs and determination <br />of feasibility-/preliminary-level total construction costs for new <br />siphon pipeline and appurtenances; and <br />5) Preparation of summary memorandums on the siphon pipeline <br />project findings for the project to date. <br />Also, the High Line Canal Company requested the design team to include a design for an automated trash <br />rack system for installation at the Smith Arroyo siphon pipeline site. FPI Companies of Shafter, California <br />(a leading manufacturer of automated trash rack systems) provided an on-site reconnaissance and <br />evaluation of the existing siphon pipeline system, manufacturer design input for a new FPI Traveling Water <br />Screen application, and developed the project-related costs for the site trash rack installation as well. <br />Based on the initial feasibility-level design engineering work, a reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) was <br />determined to be the most cost-effective siphon pipeline replacement for the High Line Canal Company. <br />If you should have any questions concerning this Feasibility Report and High Line Canal Company <br />financial information as submitted herein, please call any of the undersigned. <br />C../ <br />Gerald W. Knudsen, P.E. <br />Knudsen Engineering, Inc. <br />NRCS Technical Services Provider <br />Brice E: Boesch, P.E. <br />Boesch-Fisher Engineering, Inc. <br />~vvs y <br />Gary R. La , P:E. <br />Lake Engineering Consultants, Inc. <br />cc. LEC Project # 24 File <br />