Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A ground survey for the project was conducted by B-F in March of 2005. Also, a <br />geologic/geotechnical field investigation was completed in late May 2005 under the <br />direction ofLEC, followed by geotechnical laboratory materials testing in June 2005. <br />The geotechnical firm of A. G. Wassenaar, Inc. of Denver, Colorado was used for <br />completing test drilling and soil sampling activities in the field and for the geotechnical <br />laboratory testing of selected soil samples collected during the field test drilling <br />investigation. The surveyed plan and profile views of the existing Smith Arroyo siphon <br />pipeline crossing, including the inlet and outlet structures, and portions of the upstream <br />and downstream canal bottom profiles, are shown on Plate 1. Pertinent geologic/ <br />geotechnical information, based on the results of the ground investigation, is also <br />shown. Approximately 150 feet of the existing siphon pipeline is apparently installed <br />below claystone bedrock. Ground water levels are also shallow, and the pipeline is <br />submerged below ground water for much of its length. <br /> <br />Photographs of the existing High Line Canal system facilities and site conditions at the <br />Smith Arroyo siphon pipeline crossing are presented in Appendix C. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED <br /> <br />In February 2005, the High Line Canal Company requested Mr. Brice E. Boesch, P.E., of <br />B-F to perform a feasibility-level evaluation and design for replacing the existing <br />decades-old High Line Canal siphon pipeline at the Smith Arroyo crossing. As a <br />followup to this request, B-F and LEC evaluated several siphon replacement alternatives <br />and selected a preferred design alternative given the High Line Canal Company's <br />reported available but limited monetary funds for final engineering design and project <br />construction. Both B-F and LEC, along with Knudsen Engineering, Inc. of Morrison, <br />Colorado, the contracting agent for the project, formed a High Line Canal Siphon <br />Pipeline Design Team. The Design Team started initial feasibility-level engineering <br />studies shortly thereafter in March 2005. The Design Team also provided interim <br />estimated preliminary construction costs associated with replacing the existing High Line <br />Canal concrete-encased wood stave pipeline at the Smith Arroyo crossing. <br /> <br />A DO NOTHING ALTERNATIVE was never envisioned by the High Line Canal <br />Company because a possible failure of the existing siphon pipeline system, i.e., partial or <br />total collapse of the buried pipeline, could disruptthe delivery of needed irrigation water <br />to downstream users until effective system repairs could be made. Approximately two- <br />thirds (2/3) of the High Line Canal Company members farm downstream of the Smith <br />Arroyo siphon site. Based on providing 2/3 of the 501-cfs water right downstream, the <br />canal shareholders require a minimum flow of 334 cfs. <br /> <br />Based on preliminary input from Mr. Dan Henrichs, the High Line Canal Company <br />Project Superintendent, LEC completed an initial hydraulics evaluation of the existing <br />Smith Arroyo siphon pipeline system and a hydraulics equivalency evaluation of <br />alternative piping materials for eight proposed pipeline replacement alternatives, given <br />the hydraulic capacity of the existing wood stave pipeline system. In the feasibility- <br />level design evaluation and cost estimating tasks, the two major variables included the <br />