My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ02025
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
PROJ02025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:39 AM
Creation date
7/9/2007 2:03:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0044FX
Contractor Name
Larimer County, Board of County Commissioners
Contract Type
Miscellaneous
Water District
0
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The funding approved by the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) Construction <br />Loan Fund is approximately 90 percent of the total project cost or about $11.0 Million. <br />The annual debt service on a 30-year, 3.75-percent CWCB loan is approximately $616,964 <br />Larimer County and the City of Fort Collins plan to implement a Dry Creek Basin <br />Stormwater Utility that will collect revenue from basin landholders that benefit from the <br />project. The estimated average annual revenue during the repayment period is about <br />$650,000. In addition, the utility expects to collect payments from the Larimer and Weld <br />Irrigation Company (Irrigation Company) for loan repayment corresponding to 1/2 of the <br />cost of the pipeline, as well as system investment fees on new development and interest <br />income on the utility's own reserve fund. Annual funding from these sources is projected <br />to average approximately $296,000 during the repayment period. The utility's projected <br />combined revenues can easily service the debt as demonstrated by a coverage ratio of 1.23, <br />including anticipated utility expenditures on other capital projects. The funding for the <br />project will not be sought if the revenue stream is not implemented. <br /> <br />The Selected Project has been developed from the elements of the three alternatives <br />presented herein. The Project will be constructed, operated and maintained by a combined <br />joint effort of the City and County. The County is taking the lead in the construction ofthe <br />project, in accordance with the terms of the Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA). The <br />City is taking the lead in the maintenance of the facilities after they are constructed. <br /> <br />The hydrology used in sizing the flood control facilities is based on new rainfall intensities <br />recently adapted by the City. This work (performed by URS) is based on the results of past <br />hydrologic studies performed for Dry Creek basin. This information is appropriate for the <br />alternatives analysis performed for this report. <br /> <br />This report identifies and discusses the feasibility of alternative stormwater methods of <br />reducing the flood threat within the Dry Creek basin. The County and City have identified <br />. the preferred or selected alternative. The objective for the Selected Alternative will be to <br />eliminate the flood threat to approximately 800 structures within the Lower Dry Creek <br />basin during storms up to the 100-year event and remove the requirement of the <br />enforcement of floodplain regulations. <br /> <br />Initially three feasible alternatives for flood control were identified and compared as part <br />of this study. These alternatives are: <br /> <br />Alternative No.1) Divert peak flows of approximately 5,OOO-cfs at the Larimer -Weld <br />Canal around the Lower Basin to the west and eventually into the Cache la Poudre <br />River (Poudre River). This alternative was eliminated due to high cost, excessive <br />environmental and permitting challenges, and the potential impact to water rights. <br /> <br />Alternative No.2) Temporarily store much of the 100-year flood runoff in a flood <br />detention reservoir and reduce the peak flow through the drainage basin to a safe <br />discharge rate, or <br /> <br />Alternative No.3) A combination of temporarily storage and diversion facilities to <br />minimize flooding in the Lower Basin of the Dry Creek Lower Basin. <br /> <br />Final Feasibility Study for the Dry Creek Basin <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.