Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Table ESt: Alternative Comparison <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br /> <br /> Alt No.1) Diversion to $16.7 15 0.87 Environmental and <br /> Cache la Poudre River permitting issues, water <br /> n ts issues <br /> Alt No.2) Main Stem $18.8 15 0.76 No large dam site location <br /> Storage available <br /> Alt No.3) Option A $13.3 15 1.13 Uses a large dam on COTP <br /> and smaller off-stream <br /> detentions <br /> Alt No.3) Option B, Cole $12.9 15 1.126 Uses a large dam a dam <br /> - Morgan site #5 and #6 near Terry <br /> Lake Canal <br /> Alt No.3) Option C $12.9 15 1.16 Uses a smaller dam on <br /> COTP and a detention at <br /> Dam #6 <br /> Alt No.3) Option D $12.6 15 1.19 Uses a large dam on COTP <br /> and a second at the Happy <br /> Cow site. <br />e Alt No.4) Do Nothing $15.0 0 Does not include potential <br /> for loss of life. <br /> Note: * Benefits are defined as reduction in direct damages flood of$15.0 million from a <br />100-year flood. If you use the cumulative benefit of $42.0 million, the B/C ratio ./ <br />increases significantly. <br /> The selected alternative is storage and diversion alternative option D. This option maybe a/ <br /> slightly modified based on additional property owners input and meetings with City and <br /> County during the design of the project <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Final Feasibility Study for the Dry Creek Basin <br /> <br />9 <br />