My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
27
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:42:31 PM
Creation date
7/9/2007 1:51:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/23/2007
Description
IWMD Section - Water Supply Reserve Account May 2007 Grant Allocations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Many of the water users in this basin did not provide information during the Statewide Water Supply <br />Initiative. The users generally indicated that they "we're fine and had adequate supplies" or did not respond. <br />Subsequently these users have indicated that they may not have adequate supplies and are currently <br />undertal(ing efforts to quantify current and future needs and supplies. The application from Orchard City <br />identifies the need for future supply but does not provide information on current and future supply and <br />demand. <br /> <br />Issues/Additional Needs: <br /> <br />. The initial budget sheet does not match the detailed budget sheet. Engineering services in the initial <br />sheet are $678,000 and the detailed sheet shows $799,791.50; please clarify. Also please clarify the <br />how the second phase match and grant add up to the project budget. <br /> <br />. The miscellaneous line item of $1,000 needs to be detailed; what types of items and rates are <br />included? <br /> <br />. The outside services budget line of$10,000 needs to be detailed. <br /> <br />. The water availability analysis needs to have more detail on; the decree, yield, and source of supply. <br /> <br />. A project schedule needs to be provided. <br /> <br />. The applicant should clarify what would happen with the project if the future request for funding of <br />$480,000 is not approved i.e., will the design be completed? The CWCB can not guarantee funding <br />at this time. <br /> <br />. The applicant needs to provide additional information on the current water usage, future growth <br />plans, funding/revenue sources (e.g. tap fees, services charges, etc.). <br /> <br />. It would be helpful if the applicant would provide information on how they will finance the ultimate <br />construction of the proj ect. <br /> <br />. Please provide a description of the grant review process by the Gunnison Roundtable. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of up to $60,000 to complete the Orchard City Reservoir Project - Final Design. <br />Approval is contingent on successful resolution of the above issues/additional needs. <br /> <br />All products, data and information developed as a result of this grant must be provided to CWCB in hard <br />copy and electronic format as part of the project documentation. This information will in turn be made <br />widely available to Basin Roundtables and the general public and will help promote the development of a <br />common technical platform. <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.