Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Approximately one w:eek after the' r,eview meeti.ng a memol will be issued with forma~ <br />responses to c1omments. The Engineer's Project. 1vi,an age r and, ProJect En,gin.e.er wi~~ <br />attend the meetin,g'~ oth_er team members will be available ifn.ecessary.. <br /> <br />· Preseuta:tioDs - These -meetin.gswiil be for' presentat[,ons to OrcllardCfty and/or Orc:hard <br />City's 8,oardM'em,bers. It is anti,ci,pated that three pres-entation meeting.swi.ll be held. <br />The firSt wH~, be th,e kick-off.meeting, th,e .secon,d coincurrent \vith Sllbmittai of the D'raft <br />F]nal- Design, and the th.ird afler th,e su~mitta"( alfthe Final Design,. The Project Prm.cipal" <br />Project: Man,ager and Project En,gineer wi.ll ;attend the presentation meetin,gs,. Other tieam <br />mem bers wi 11 be available, if necessary + <br /> <br />Task ,A200: lufor.matiOD Exehang:e a~Qd proj-eet Kick~off: <br /> <br />At theklc.k~ffmeeting specific information will be req,uested such as ti1e--inpoints, final <br />hydraulic requirements, operational reql.lirements, proc.esscon.trol ~equirements, 've~rification of <br />required me chanica I systems and an'y oots'ide: interface tb 8't mig,h.t be req,uited'i A ,des ign eri teria. . <br />will be pliep,ared to sUm~marize the En,gin.eer's uI1derstandin,g ofth.e final design requiitements" <br />The design .criteria will pro'Yide tile b,asis for the final design. The engineer will s,ubmit th.e dra'ft . <br />and final desi,gn criteria in _PDiF format. <br /> <br />TJask AJO:O: Amternatlve Analysis: <br /> <br />Smith 'Wi:lliams will 'com:pfete an alt'iemati.vie analysis 'ofup ;to three Iconstruction methods for the <br />water r,eservnir. 'The alternative analysis will be completed for determining the most cost <br />,efficient dam structure for th.e propo.sed res:enroir+ The alternatives will take int,o con,sideration <br />the d.esign criteria developed in Task A200, as well as regulatory requirements and property <br />restrictions. "The alternatives will be co'mpared and eval.uat.ed using a number of ranking criteria <br />l.D;cluding but not: n,ecessarily limi(ied to, the follow.ing., <br /> <br />-. LandP-os:ition <br /> <br />· J.\.rea of Di sturban:ce <br /> <br />· Wat,er S:torag'e Capacity <br /> <br />· W'ater Resetvolr Fill Requ.irements <br /> <br />· Maximum Em'ban,kme:nt Height <br /> <br />· Imp.act from unde-rgrolUl,d works <br /> <br />· Ease of Permitting <br /> <br />Ie I Relative ,O'peratio,uar Cost <br /> <br />3 <br />