My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00166 (3)
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00166 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:12 PM
Creation date
7/6/2007 10:55:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/22/2007
Description
OWCDP Section - Colorado Foundation for Water Education FY08 Program Scope of Work
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. '.:,.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />t.. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Allocate and distribute the Quantified Surplus 50% to California, <br />46% to Arizona and 4% to Nevada, subject to c. through e. that <br />follow. <br /> <br />c. Distribute California's share first to meet basic apportionment <br />demands and MWD's demands, and then to California Priorities 6 <br />and 7 and other surplus contracts. Distribute Nevada's share first to <br />meet basic apportionment demands and SNW A demands. <br />Distribute Arizona's share to surplus demands in Arizona including <br />Off-stream Banking and interstate banking demands. Arizona, <br />California and Nevada agree that Nevada would get first priority for <br />interstate banking in Arizona. <br /> <br />d. Distribute any unused share of the Quantified Surplus in accordance <br />with Section 2, Allocation of Unused Basic Apportionment Water <br />Under Article II(B)(6). <br /> <br />e. Determine whether MWD, SNW A and Arizona have received the <br />amount of water they would have received under Sections 4.B.l or <br />4.B.2 if a Quantified Surplus had not been determined. If they have <br />not, then determine and meet all demands provided for in Sections <br />4.B.l or 4.B.2. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Flood Control Surplus <br /> <br />In Years in which the Secretary makes space-building or flood control <br />releases pursuant to the February 8, 1984 Field Working Agreement <br />between Reclamation and the Army Corps of Engineers, the Secretary shall <br />determine a Flood Control Surplus for the remainder of that Year or the <br />subsequent Year as specified in Section 12. In such Years, releases will be <br />made to satisfy all beneficial uses within the United States, including <br />unlimited Off-Stream Banking. Under current practice, surplus <br />declarations under the Treaty for Mexico are declared when flood control <br />releases are made. Modeling assumptions used in the FEIS are based on <br />this practice. These Guidelines are not intended to identify, or change in <br />any manner, conditions when Mexico may schedule up to an additional <br />0.2 maf. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />ICS Surplus <br /> <br />a. In Years in which Lake Mead's elevation is projected on January 1 <br />to be above elevation 1075 feet and ICS has been requested for <br />release, the Secretary shall determine an ICS Surplus. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />In Years in which a Quantified Surplus or a Domestic Surplus is <br />available to a Contractor, the Secretary shall first deliver the <br />Quantified Surplus or Domestic Surplus before delivering any <br />requested ICS to that Contractor. If Quantified Surplus or Domestic <br />Surplus is insufficient or unavailable to meet a Contractor's <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.