BOARD00184 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. 2) There are no additional water savings to be hadfrom agriculture, it's already efficient as it can ever get. It's true that producers are very efficient - and it's not the irrigation efficiency that we are targeting in this study. Rather we seek ways to manage consumptive use in crops so that consumptive use savings can be used as another crop. We think that producers have the very best ideas for reducing crop consumptive use, which is why we are surveying, interviewing and planning crop demonstrations. 3) Reduced irrigation may work on alfalfa (based on Neil's slides), but won't work on another crop. . As far as water savings goes, alfalfa has a high potential because it 1) uses large quantities of water, 2) can tolerate drought conditions, and 3) can resume growth after drought when water is available. Other perennial forage crops, including grass forages, have similar qualities. Smaller, but still meaningful, amounts of consumptive water use savings can be obtained from limited irrigation of grain crops. Our study will emphasis limited irrigation com grain. We will also document consumptive water use patterns of rotation crop management with fallow and crop 'rotations with alternative crops such as sunflower, soybean, canol a, winter wheat, and summer annual forages. 4) The entire farm community is against this project. It is true that some farmers view this project as a threat - that it may accelerate the transfer of water from agricultural to urban use. However, in a number of venues, this research has been viewed as an opportunity for farmers and may be a means to keep their communities viable. Farmers and communities leaders have responded positively the project at the South Platte Forum, the Lower South Platte Forum, the Larimer County Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting, the Four States Irrigation Council Meeting, the Water Congress, the Colorado Council for Cooperatives Annual Issues Conference, the Western Rural Conservation Districts Annual Meeting, the Arkansas River Valley Roundtable Meeting and the Colorado River Valley Roundtable Meeting. The demonstration and research effort is not unique to the Iliff farms either. Companion projects are underway with funding from CSU's Agricultural Experiment Station, the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, as well as USDA National Research Initiatives funding. Demonstrations of similar research, albeit on a much smaller scale, can be found with cooperators in Berthoud, LaSalle, Akron, andsBurlington. .: