My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00176 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00176 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:23 PM
Creation date
7/6/2007 10:39:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/23/2007
Description
WSP Section - Navajo-Gallup EIS and Status of Navajo Settlement Negotiations - Arizona Position
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />> <br />;, ~ il ' <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT - 11/21/2006 <br /> <br />Comments on Draft Navajo-Gallup Pipeline Bill <br /> <br />General Comments <br /> <br />. The bill is premised on a draft EIS and draft hydrologic determination, neither of <br />which has yet been accepted by the Secretary of the Interior. This is not a good <br />precedent, particularly when the Lower Basin States have expressed concern <br />about the draft hydrologic determination. <br /> <br />. The bill leaves many unanswered questions about Colorado River accounting, <br />water delivery contracting and priority of deliveries. The specific comments <br />below attempt to clarify many of these issues. <br /> <br />Specific Comments <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Priority within the San Juan River system. The priority of the Navajo-Gallup <br />pipeline water within the San Juan River system is not clear. Section 1 02(b) of <br />the bill provides that the Secretary shall "allocate the shortage" to the Navajo <br />Reservoir water supply, with first priority going to the water for the Navajo- <br />Gallup pipeline. This seems to say that the water for the pipeline is the first to be <br />shorted. But this section ofthe bill is amending ~ 11 of Pub. L. 87-483, which <br />directs the Secretary to apportion the water that is available during shortage on the <br />San Juan, suggesting that the pipeline might be first to receive available water <br />during a shortage. The bill should be revised to clearly express the intended <br />result. <br /> <br />2. Colorado River Compact Issues. Section 103 ofthe bill states that it does not <br />amend the Law ofthe River "unless expressly provided in this Act." There is <br />nothing in the bill that would expressly amend the 1922 Colorado River Compact. <br />Accordingly, there is nothing in the bill that would: <br /> <br />. Allow the diversion of water in the Upper Basin for use in the Lower <br />Basin. <br />. Relieve the Upper Basin from any part of its Compact obligation to deliver <br />75 million acre-feet to the Lower Basin every 10 years. <br /> <br />To address these problems, the following should be added to the end of ~303 of <br />the bill: <br /> <br />"(h) COLORADO RIVER COMPACT. Notwithstanding any other <br />provision oflaw, water may be diverted from the San Juan River in New <br />Mexico for use within the Lower Basin, as that term is used in the 1922 <br />Colorado River Compact, either in New Mexico or on the Navajo <br />Reservation in Arizona. Water diverted from the San Juan River and <br />delivered for use on the Navajo Reservation in Arizona shall be deemed to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.