My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00167 (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00167 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:46:13 PM
Creation date
7/6/2007 10:38:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/22/2007
Description
WSP Section - Platte River Recovery Updates
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />O!.- ." <br /> <br />with the issue of post-May I call protection in Congress, which has the ultimate authority <br />for United States property and to bind the Bureau of Reclamation. . <br /> <br />4. Congress is also the appropriate body to consider the equities involved in the impact of <br />the PMP. As we have previously noted, (1) the FElS shows no correlation between water <br />uses in the Upper North Platte River Basin and water shortages in the Nebraska recovery <br />area, and (2) the Supreme Court and the Special Master in the Nebraska v. Wyoming <br />lawsuit recognized that there is little or no hydrologic connection between water use <br />above Pathfinder Reservoir in Wyoming and water shortage in the Nebraska recovery <br />area. Yet, the Upper Basin water users are asked to bear the brunt of the PMP impacts. <br />This inequity may not be given the weight it deserves by the Board of Control. It is up to <br />Congress. <br /> <br />5. The shortcomings of the FEIS are also properly before Congress as the Board of Control <br />cannot remedy its deficiencies. As we have noted, Appendix F of the final Modified <br />Decree mandates that the Bureau of Rec1amati0n cannot proceed with the PMP until it <br />has been appropriately considered under the National Environmental Policy Act. As the <br />impacts of a post-May 1 call were not even con,sidered in the FEIS, such a call cannot be <br />part of the approved PRRIP program. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />The North Platte River is already overappropriated. There is simply no additional water <br />available for storage in Pathfinder Reservoir, and no new water will be created by way of <br />the PMP. In addition, the environmental and rnunicipal accounts contemplated for the <br />PMP will store water on an equal priority basis !with all other users ofthe Reservoir. This <br />becomes an additional demand for the full, unrestricted 1.016 million acre-feet of existing <br />storage capacity in the Reservoir. Irrigators in the Upper North Platte River basin are <br />asked to give up their water rights for both the *RRIP and municipalities. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Congress, and specifically the Water and Power and Power Subcommittee, is the appropriate <br />forum to provide the relief necessary for the water users in the Upper North Platte River Basin. <br />Amending Senate Bill 752 now with the language proposed in our previous comments will <br />achieve that very end and lessen the chance for future disputes on the PMP implementation. <br /> <br />We thank you again for the opportunity to comment on Senate Bill 752, for your questions on the <br />appropriate mechanism to provide post-May 1 call protection, and for your interest in the Upper <br />North Platte River Basin. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />15308 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.