My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water as Ecosystem Base Handout - Melinda Kass
CWCB
>
Interbasin Compact Committee
>
Backfile
>
Water as Ecosystem Base Handout - Melinda Kass
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:56:06 AM
Creation date
7/6/2007 10:31:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Interbasin Compact Committee
Title
Water as Ecosystem Base
Date
7/25/2006
Author
Melinda Kassen
Interbasin CC - Doc Type
Presentations
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br /> <br />Increased risk of stranding, predation and disease <br />? <br /> <br />Decreased available spawning and rearing habitat <br /> <br />3. Wh at is the impact on water’s ecological value of having a fully developed water <br />resource at the same time we face continually increasing demands for water? <br /> <br />Having a fully developed water resource creates a zero sum game with regard to <br />changing water uses. In large part be cause ecosystem protection was recognized as a <br />beneficial use only late in the life of the prior appropriation system, and then only in a <br />limited way, the current allocation of the water pie has resulted in unsustainable <br />depletions and alterations of weste rn rivers, including many in Colorado. Thus, <br />restoration of a critical mass of rivers is difficult indeed. The constraints of a largely <br />over - appropriated situation on moving water to ecosystem protection are, simply put, <br />formidable. Not only are there s ignificant costs of transfers, but philosophical resistance <br />remains in many corners of the water establishment to the notion that the use of water to <br />sustain ecosystems should be on a par with traditional, diversionary water uses. <br /> <br />Still, there are a surpr ising number of entities who are at least willing to, and in some <br />cases affirmatively engaged in, shifting some water back to ecosystem protection. <br />Interestingly, these entities have quite varied interests in such work: <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />Federal agencies with obligations to protect threatened and endangered species; <br />? <br /> <br />State and local government agencies, along with affected water users, who want to <br />avoid additional species’ listings or mitigate the effect of such listings on water users; <br />? <br /> <br />Agricultural producers who have disco vered that recreation based on healthy stream <br />flows can provide an important income stream; and <br />? <br /> <br />TU , other conservation organizations (including those focused primarily on land use <br />preservation) and state water trusts. <br /> <br />Because most western state legal syst ems severely limit the availability of market - based <br />water transactions for moving water to ecosystem protection, these entities resort to other <br />means, some of which are more popular than others. Given the reality that the bulk of the <br />region’s water develo pment occurred before anyone thought much about the importance <br />of the value of ecosystems (or the value of water to ecosystems), there are often three <br />components to this approach : conserve what’s still functioning, protect streams at risk <br />and restore enou gh degraded rivers to sustain a functioning ecosystem. Colorado <br />conservation organizations have nicknamed this River CPR. See , Facing Our Future <br />(2005), available at a booth outside or on - line at www.cotrout.org ; t he relevant section of <br />this report is reprinted in the attached Appendix .) <br /> <br />Regional examples of creative means for restoring stream flow include: <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />Re - operations of federal facilities to restore fisheries, as occurred on the South Fork <br />of the Snake River using Bureau of Reclamation facilities <br />? <br /> <br />Voluntary agreements to forego diversions during drought to protect minimum <br />fishery flows, as the Blackfoot Challenge accomplished in Montana; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.