<br />Section 4
<br />Legal Framework for Water Use
<br />
<br />--
<br />
<br />result, increased efficiency of use under an augmentation
<br />plan potentially reduces the amount of credit a water
<br />user receives for water returned to the stream
<br />unconsumed.
<br />
<br />4.2.6 Instream Flows
<br />
<br />Under the 1969 Act, the CWCB is authorized to
<br />appropriate water for "minimum stream flows or for
<br />natural surface water levels or volumes for natural lakes
<br />to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable
<br />degree."37 Appropriations for instream flows may only be
<br />made by the CWCB, not by private individuals (however,
<br />it is noted that a few private instream flows were
<br />obtained in the early 1970s upon initial passage of the
<br />statute, but this is no longer allowed under the law), and
<br />must be made within the priority system, consistent with
<br />the restrictions in Sections 5 and 6 of Colorado's
<br />Constitution. The CWCB can also acquire water rights for
<br />instream flows "by grant purchase, donation, bequest,
<br />devise, lease, exchange, or other contractual
<br />agreement." 38
<br />
<br />In recent years, Colorado's legislature has expanded the
<br />resources available to the CWCB to protect instream
<br />flows. In 2002, the legislature increased the sources of
<br />funding that the CWCB may use to acquire water for
<br />instream flows, to include "any funds available to it, other
<br />than the construction fund created in section 37-60-121,
<br />for acquisition of water rights and their conversion to
<br />instream flow rights.39 In 2003, the legislature amended
<br />S 37-83-105, C.R.S., which provides for temporary loans
<br />or exchanges of water between water users in times of
<br />drought without requiring adjudication of a change of
<br />water rights, to allow the CWCB to receive loaned water
<br />for instream flow purposes on a temporary basis, not to
<br />exceed 120 days, in any basin where the Governor has
<br />declared a drought or other emergency.40 Such loans are
<br />subject to a determination by the State Engineer that
<br />other water users will not be injured.
<br />
<br />It is essential that the state be able to acquire water
<br />rights for instream flow purposes in order to protect
<br />wildlife and the environment in a prior appropriation state
<br />during times of drought. Since Colorado water law does
<br />not allow the state to consider environmental factors in
<br />
<br />37 CR5. S 37-92-102(3).
<br />38 Id.
<br />39 See id
<br />40 House Bill 03-1320.
<br />
<br />CONI
<br />
<br />4-6
<br />
<br />allocating or administering water, the only way for the
<br />state to ensure protection of stream flows for public
<br />purposes is by acquiring water rights, itself, within the
<br />priority system. By acquiring a water right with an
<br />enforceable priority, the state can place environmental
<br />concerns on equal footing with agricultural, commercial,
<br />municipal, and other uses of water. This means that in
<br />times of scarcity, the state's instream flows will be
<br />protected in a manner consistent with their priorities - to
<br />the extent the priorities are junior to other water rights,
<br />the CWCB's instream flows will be curtailed to make
<br />water available to other senior water users, and to the
<br />extent the CWCB's priorities are senior, the CWCB may
<br />request the Division Engineer to curtail more junior users
<br />to protect its instream flows.
<br />
<br />In Colorado, recreation is a recognized beneficial use.
<br />Governmental entities can appropriate water solely for
<br />the purposes of recreation and boating. Recent
<br />enthusiasm for kayaking, and the appropriation of water
<br />for in-channel use, has sparked further debate among
<br />water users regarding this use of water.
<br />
<br />For example, the City of Golden pursued an application
<br />for an in-channel water right for a kayak course. Golden
<br />sought to appropriate 1,000 cubic feet per second (cfs)
<br />for this purpose, which essentially equates to all the
<br />water in Clear Creek during peak flow in most years. On
<br />appeal, the Supreme Court, from which one member
<br />recused himself, split equally, so that the water court's
<br />decree adjudicating this issue was affirmed.
<br />
<br />In reaction to various claims for in-channel recreation
<br />rights, the General Assembly enacted legislation limiting
<br />the right to appropriate RICDs to municipal entities for
<br />"minimum streamflow as it is diverted, captured,
<br />controlled, and placed to beneficial use between specific
<br />points defined by physical control structures for a
<br />reasonable recreation experience in and on the water." 41
<br />Applicants for such rights now must forward their
<br />application to the CWCB for review.42 After reviewing the
<br />application, the CWCB makes a recommendation to the
<br />water court on whether the application should be
<br />granted, granted with conditions, or denied. 43
<br />
<br />41 S 37-92-103 (10.3), C.R.S.
<br />42 S 37-92-102(5), C.R.S.
<br />43 Id.
<br />
<br />S:\1177\Basin Reports\South Platte\S4_South Platte.doc
<br />
|