Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 4 <br />Legal Framework for Water Use <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />result, increased efficiency of use under an augmentation <br />plan potentially reduces the amount of credit a water <br />user receives for water returned to the stream <br />unconsumed. <br /> <br />4.2.6 Instream Flows <br /> <br />Under the 1969 Act, the CWCB is authorized to <br />appropriate water for "minimum stream flows or for <br />natural surface water levels or volumes for natural lakes <br />to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable <br />degree."37 Appropriations for instream flows may only be <br />made by the CWCB, not by private individuals (however, <br />it is noted that a few private instream flows were <br />obtained in the early 1970s upon initial passage of the <br />statute, but this is no longer allowed under the law), and <br />must be made within the priority system, consistent with <br />the restrictions in Sections 5 and 6 of Colorado's <br />Constitution. The CWCB can also acquire water rights for <br />instream flows "by grant purchase, donation, bequest, <br />devise, lease, exchange, or other contractual <br />agreement." 38 <br /> <br />In recent years, Colorado's legislature has expanded the <br />resources available to the CWCB to protect instream <br />flows. In 2002, the legislature increased the sources of <br />funding that the CWCB may use to acquire water for <br />instream flows, to include "any funds available to it, other <br />than the construction fund created in section 37-60-121, <br />for acquisition of water rights and their conversion to <br />instream flow rights.39 In 2003, the legislature amended <br />S 37-83-105, C.R.S., which provides for temporary loans <br />or exchanges of water between water users in times of <br />drought without requiring adjudication of a change of <br />water rights, to allow the CWCB to receive loaned water <br />for instream flow purposes on a temporary basis, not to <br />exceed 120 days, in any basin where the Governor has <br />declared a drought or other emergency.40 Such loans are <br />subject to a determination by the State Engineer that <br />other water users will not be injured. <br /> <br />It is essential that the state be able to acquire water <br />rights for instream flow purposes in order to protect <br />wildlife and the environment in a prior appropriation state <br />during times of drought. Since Colorado water law does <br />not allow the state to consider environmental factors in <br /> <br />37 CR5. S 37-92-102(3). <br />38 Id. <br />39 See id <br />40 House Bill 03-1320. <br /> <br />CONI <br /> <br />4-6 <br /> <br />allocating or administering water, the only way for the <br />state to ensure protection of stream flows for public <br />purposes is by acquiring water rights, itself, within the <br />priority system. By acquiring a water right with an <br />enforceable priority, the state can place environmental <br />concerns on equal footing with agricultural, commercial, <br />municipal, and other uses of water. This means that in <br />times of scarcity, the state's instream flows will be <br />protected in a manner consistent with their priorities - to <br />the extent the priorities are junior to other water rights, <br />the CWCB's instream flows will be curtailed to make <br />water available to other senior water users, and to the <br />extent the CWCB's priorities are senior, the CWCB may <br />request the Division Engineer to curtail more junior users <br />to protect its instream flows. <br /> <br />In Colorado, recreation is a recognized beneficial use. <br />Governmental entities can appropriate water solely for <br />the purposes of recreation and boating. Recent <br />enthusiasm for kayaking, and the appropriation of water <br />for in-channel use, has sparked further debate among <br />water users regarding this use of water. <br /> <br />For example, the City of Golden pursued an application <br />for an in-channel water right for a kayak course. Golden <br />sought to appropriate 1,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) <br />for this purpose, which essentially equates to all the <br />water in Clear Creek during peak flow in most years. On <br />appeal, the Supreme Court, from which one member <br />recused himself, split equally, so that the water court's <br />decree adjudicating this issue was affirmed. <br /> <br />In reaction to various claims for in-channel recreation <br />rights, the General Assembly enacted legislation limiting <br />the right to appropriate RICDs to municipal entities for <br />"minimum streamflow as it is diverted, captured, <br />controlled, and placed to beneficial use between specific <br />points defined by physical control structures for a <br />reasonable recreation experience in and on the water." 41 <br />Applicants for such rights now must forward their <br />application to the CWCB for review.42 After reviewing the <br />application, the CWCB makes a recommendation to the <br />water court on whether the application should be <br />granted, granted with conditions, or denied. 43 <br /> <br />41 S 37-92-103 (10.3), C.R.S. <br />42 S 37-92-102(5), C.R.S. <br />43 Id. <br /> <br />S:\1177\Basin Reports\South Platte\S4_South Platte.doc <br />