Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Non-construction and Other Projects. Not applicable. <br /> <br />3. Annual Operation and Maintenance. Future maintenance costs for cleaning and applying <br />a new interior coating or exterior paint will be slightly higher for the larger tank. Since this <br />work is commonly required only after a period of 15 years or more, those costs have not been <br />quantified in this preliminary study. Other than periodic inspection, no other maintenance <br />expense is associated with the storage tank. It should be noted that operation and maintenance <br />work associated with the new tank will merely be replacing that which is currently performed <br />on the existing tank, Because the new tank is replacing an older tank which is in poor condition, <br />the required maintenance effort should be less than what is now required, <br /> <br />4. Present Worth, Because operations and maintenance of the new tank will be approximately <br />the same regardless of tank size, and because it does not represent an added burden to existing <br />operational expense, a present worth cost analysis for each tank size alternative was not <br />,prepared, Alternative cost comparison can be made based on the initial construction cost. <br /> <br />H. Advantages/Disadvantages. <br /> <br />The larger size tank has obvious advantages related to increased storage capacity and the ability <br />of the tank to satisfy conservatively applied design criteria. However, it has the disadvantage <br />of being significantly more expensive, approximately 22% to 25% higher than the smaller 600,000 <br />gallon storage tank alternative. Since the construction cost for the larger tank would consume <br />a significant portion of the financial resources available for the water system improvements, of <br />which the storage tank is just a part, it is rejected for reasons related to its cost. <br /> <br />The 600,000 gallon tank is the preferred choice. The tank will contain sufficient reserve to meet <br />ISO criteria for fire protection. The availability of planned ground water wells to supply water <br />during emergency periods and the ability to flow water by gravity alone into the distribution <br />system from the treatment plant clearwell, reduces the reliance on storage reserve to provide for <br />emergency needs. . <br /> <br />V.2 Type of Storage Tank <br /> <br />A. Description <br /> <br />This alternative examines the feasibility of different types of storage tanks, The types considered <br />for this project are: <br />· Pre-stressed concrete tank <br />· Reinforced concrete tank <br />· Insulated steel tank <br /> <br />Town of Minturn Water System Upgrade Project, March, 1995 <br /> <br />21 <br />