My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ01987
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
PROJ01987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2011 9:03:11 AM
Creation date
7/3/2007 12:44:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150013
Contractor Name
North Poudre Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
4
County
Larimer
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866-4474 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />I) <br /> <br />January 11, 1999 <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br /> <br />James S. Lochhead <br />Executive Director, DNR <br /> <br />Daries C. Li!e, P.E. <br />Director, ewcs <br /> <br />Peter H. Evans <br />Acting Director, ewCB <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERV A TION BOARD <br />FEASIBILITY STUDY REVIEW MEMO <br /> <br />Study: North Poudre Irrigation Co. - Feasibility Study for Reservoir # 6 Outlet, Reservoir #5 <br />Spillway, Reservoir #4 Rehabilitation, and Indian Creek Reservoir Rehabilitation <br /> <br />Consultant: Smith Geotechnical <br /> <br />Reviewer: Bill Green <br /> <br />1. A brief executive summary would be helpful. <br /> <br />2. There is little or no description of existing facilities. The report should provide an overview <br />of the entire system (operation, <br />yields, sources, etc.) and some information about each of the facilities included in the <br />feasibility study (location, capacity, etc.). <br /> <br />3. It would also be helpful if a set of photos could be provided for each facility proposed as part <br />of the project. <br /> <br />4. A summary of overall system yield over a period of years and average annual yield per share <br />would be useful. <br /> <br />5. Some explanation of the storage decree tabulation in Table 10 would be helpful. <br /> <br />6. A little more explanation should be provided as to why 404 Permits, an EA or EIS may not <br />be required for the project(s). Has the Corps of Engineers been contacted? <br /> <br />7. Suggest that the revenue/expenditure projections in Tables 13 and 14 be done in current <br />dollars - without inflation. It's OK to have another table using inflation if desired by the <br />Company but more useful for the CWCB in-house financial analysis without. <br /> <br />8. The Company's requested loan terms should be included in the report. <br /> <br />9. An explanation as to how the Company will fund its share of the project should be provided <br />in the text and explicitly included in the revenue/expenditure projections. <br /> <br />10. Some explanation should be provided for Table 14. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.