My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150036 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
C150036 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2010 10:03:13 AM
Creation date
7/3/2007 9:46:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150036
Contractor Name
Weld County Tri Area Sanitation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
2
County
Weld
Bill Number
HB 00-1419
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Colorado Division of Water Resources. This permit is required to ensure that any <br />discharge of dirty groundwater does not return directly to surface waters of the <br />United States without first passing through some type of treatment system such as <br />straw bales and silt fences. <br />Based on a letter received from the Department of the Army Corp of Engineers <br />dated November 26, 1999 and enclosed within Appendix 4, the proposed regional <br />detention pond site,will not require a Department of the Army 404 permit in order <br />to proceed with construction. <br />E. Feasibility <br />Construction Feasibility: <br />As noted earlier in this study, on July 29, 1999, Kevin Gingery and Russell <br />Dahlgren visited the Tri-Town Basin to observe the project components and <br />locations of adjacent residential and commercial buildings with reference to the <br />feasibility of constructing the proposed improvements. The proposed regional <br />detention pond site is currently open and free of obstructions that could prevent <br />construction of the proposed improvements. From the preliminary design drawing <br />within Appendix 4, it appears that excess earthen soil is available from the <br />proposed regional detention pond site to construct the regional detention pond <br />embankment. Other construction materials such as riprap and concrete will need <br />to be imported to the project site in order to complete the proposed improvements. <br />Benefit/Cost Analysis: <br />The benefit/cost analysis was conducted in order to provide the information needed <br />to evaluate the economic feasibiliry and relative value of the propased <br />improvements. The benefits of the proposed drainage improvements equal the <br />value of the flooding damages that are prevented or avoided by construction of the <br />improvements. This analysis was conducted using the general methodology and <br />guidelines presented in the Methodology for Evalclation of Feasibility; Mc�lti- <br />Jacrisdictional Urban Drainage and Flood Control Projects, Urban Drainage and <br />Flood Control District, Febrafary, 1977 manual. <br />The procedure used for the benefit/cost analysis is summarized below: <br />l. Flood depths for the affected areas in the District were determined for the <br />100 year, 50 year, 10 year, and zero damage flood events. The zero <br />damage event was assumed to be the 2 year flood. The flood depths were <br />based on information in the FEMA Flood Insurance Study and FEMA <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map for the communities of Frederick, Evanston, and <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.