My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150036 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
C150036 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2010 10:03:13 AM
Creation date
7/3/2007 9:46:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150036
Contractor Name
Weld County Tri Area Sanitation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
2
County
Weld
Bill Number
HB 00-1419
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Sear-Brown Group reviewed the 1-25 Corridor Master Drainage Plan <br />Godding Hollotiv and Tri-Town Basins South Weld Counry report and verified that <br />the hydrologic values derived within the report appear to be representative of the <br />Tri-Town Basin. From the table of hydrologic values above, the following <br />conclusions can be drawn: <br />1. The existing condition 100 year hydrology will yield the greatest amount <br />of storm water runoff that the regional detention pond will experience. <br />2. Basins 62 and 91 are mostly developed today. These basins will contribute <br />the majority of undetained storm water runoff that enters the regional <br />detention pond now and in the future. <br />3. As basins 61, 63, 92, 93, and 94 develop and utilize the current localized <br />detention pond release criteria, hydrologic contributions to the regional <br />detention pond will be reduced. <br />C. Field Investigations <br />On July 29, 1999, Kevin Gingery and Russell Dahlgren visited the Tri-Town Basin <br />to observe the basin topography, basin hydrologic features, locations and <br />conditions of existing crossings and drainageway structures, and locations of <br />adjacent residential and commercial buildings. The existing storm drainage <br />infrastructure, as noted within Figure 5 on the following page, was observed to be <br />in place as documented by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., clear of debris, <br />and available to receive what storm water runoff they were capable of handling. <br />The basin topography slopes as indicated within Figure 2. Between Weld County <br />Road 13 and the communities of Frederick, Evanston, and Firestone, the <br />abandoned Union Pacific Railroad embankment exists. The railroad tracks have <br />been removed, but large quantities of earthen embankment remain. The existing <br />Tri-Town Drainageway is located between the railroad embank.ment and the <br />residential homes. The Tri-Town Drainageway varies in shape, depth, and side <br />slopes along the communities of Frederick, Evanston, and Firestone. Upstream <br />(south) of Frederick, the Tri-Town Drainagway is not well defined as it traverses <br />existin� farm land upstream to State Highway 52. The Tri-Town Drainageway <br />does no� continue upstream of State Highway 52. It appears from the preliminary <br />design presented later in this report that excess earthen soil is available from the <br />proposed regional detention pond site to construct the regional detention pond <br />embankment. Other construction materials such as riprap and concrete will need <br />to be imported to the project site. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.