Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />cursory map study, no physical features exist that would complicate the <br />construction of a dam. <br /> <br />Mineral Resources <br /> <br />Northeastern Colorado contains various economical mineral resources including <br />petroleum, natural gas, uranium, gravel and crushed-rock aggregate, and <br />limestone. Gravel and crushed-rock aggregates are currently mined from various <br />localities in Northern Colorado, but only small amounts exist on this site. <br />Currently there are no mineral resources being extracted from this site and it <br />does not appear that the site contains sufficient resources to be mined <br />econom ically. <br /> <br />Hydrologic Evaluation <br /> <br />Dam Classification <br /> <br />Detailed dam classification studies for the proposed reservoirs are beyond the <br />scope of this feasibility study. Based on conservative assumptions, Drury <br />Reservoir can be classified as a Class II, Small dam, Cornish Plains Reservoir <br />can be classified as a Class II, Intermediate dam, and Barnesville Equalizer can <br />be classified as a Class III, Small dam. <br /> <br />HvdroloQic ModelinQ <br /> <br />Preliminary hydrologic modeling was conducted using HEC-HMS from the U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers. A runoff coefficient, Kn, of 0.06 was assumed for the <br />basins based on topographic and land-use conditions. Uniform infiltration rates <br />were determined for the soil conditions in the basins as determined from Soil <br />Conservation Service Maps. Infiltration rates of 0.16 in/hr and 0.22 in/hr were <br />used for the Drury Reservoir and Cornish Reservoir basins respectively. <br />Because the Barnesville Equalizer basin is so small, no infiltration was used in <br />the model. Synthetic unit hydrographs were determined based on the USBR's <br />Flood Hydrology Manual. Spillway discharge was modeled as a trapezoidal weir <br />with 6: 1 side slopes and a weir coefficient of 2.63. Results of the hydrologic <br />studies are summarized below. Complete details and results of the hydrologic <br />modeling are contained in Appendix D. <br /> <br />Drury Reservoir <br /> <br />The Drury Reservoir Dam can conservatively be classified as a Class II, Small <br />dam. The required design storm for a Class II, Small dam is 50% of the Probable <br />Maximum Precipitation (PMP). The required spillway length for Drury Reservoir <br />based on the design storm would make the project unfeasible. However, due to <br />the large size of the drainage basin, small reservoir size, and remote location, an <br />incremental damage analysis should allow the reservoir to be designed for the <br /> <br />New Cache Feasibility Study <br /> <br />21 <br />