My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150154 Approval Letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
C150154 Approval Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 9:58:50 AM
Creation date
7/2/2007 8:33:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150154
Contractor Name
Pine River - Bayfield Ditch Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
31
County
La Plata
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />',- <br /> <br />Pine River - Bayfield Ditch Company <br />May 19-20 2003 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 18c <br /> <br />- <br />. <br /> <br />concerns. First, is the unknown condition of the existing siphon to allow the sleeving process to be <br />successfully accomplished. Second, is the cost associated with the required excavation and <br />unforeseen problems associated with this alternative which cannot be determined until actual <br />construction begins. Third, designing the system to allow for the approximate 37 cfs could be <br />difficult, especially if a section of smaller diameter pipe is required to by-pass some obstruction(s) in <br />the existing siphon. One advantage to the slip lining would be to eliminate some of the unknown <br />problems associated with excavation of boggy soils if the siphon is replaced. <br /> <br />Alternative 3, Replacement of the siphon with a new 30" PVC pipe ($267,000) - Under this <br />alternative, the existing siphon would be replaced by a new 30-inch PVC pipe, designed to carry 37 <br />cfs. <br /> <br />Selected Alternative 3, Replacement of the siphon with a new 30" PVC pipe, was chosen as <br />the preferred alternative and the most reliable long-term solution. The new siphon will be capable <br />of delivering 37 cfs to the PRBDC system. Replacement of the siphon will require excavation of a <br />trench to a depth of approximately six feet. The trench will then be bedded with 6 inches of three- <br />quarter inch minus washed granular material, and twenty-foot joints of a 30-inch diameter PVC pipe <br />installed in the trench. The sides and top of the pipe would be covered with three-quarter inch <br />washed granular material for six inches before backfilling with native material. Several trench <br />location and alignment options will be further evaluated in the design process to address some <br />concerns about boggy soils/saturated soils. The Durango Office of the Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS) is preparing engineering designs and cost estimates for the project. <br /> <br />Total Project cost is estimated to be: <br /> <br />1. Construction Cost (inc!. contingency) $217,000 <br />2. Engineering Fees 50.000 (NRCS in-kind) <br />TOTAL $267,000 <br /> <br />The implementation schedule calls for completion of financing arrangements and final engineering <br />design in June-July 2003. Construction will take place in September to November 2003. It is <br />anticipated that a Corps of Engineers 404 permit will be required for the creek crossing. This is in <br />process and no permitting delays are anticipated. Right-of-way for the ditch is prescriptive, but the <br />three affected property owners are cooperating with PRBDC and no right-of-way issues are <br />expected. <br /> <br />Financial Analvsis <br /> <br />The total estimated cost of the project is $267,000, and PRBDC water is used exclusively for <br />agricultural purposes. Staff is recommending a 30-year maximum amount of $200,000 <br />(approximately 75% of estimated project cost) for 30 years at an interest rate of 2.75%. <br />PRBDC has sufficient cash assets budgeted to cover its $17,000 share of the project. <br /> <br />Alternative financing sources: The PRBDC investigated alternative financing sources. They have <br />obtained an in-kind grant from the NRCS for engineering design and construction inspection. The <br />PRBDC attempted to obtain other grants, but found the current economic situation had either <br />eliminated or severely decreased available grant funding. <br /> <br />Table 1 is a summary of the financial aspects of the project. A CWCB Small Project Loan of <br />$200,000 would have an annual payment of $10,865 (including the 10% reserve requirement) at the <br />loan terms of 2.75% for 30 years. This represents an annual loan cost of $1.22 per acre-foot, <br />based on an average annual delivery of 8,866 acre-feet. The CWCB loan will be repaid from <br /> <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.