My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
22 (3)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
22 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:42:26 PM
Creation date
6/26/2007 1:26:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/20/2004
Description
WSP Section - SWSI Implementation Update
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLORADO <br /> <br />l!!l ~~ <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br /> <br /> <br />Attachment 1 <br />Development of Alternatives <br />CWCB Board Meeting - July 2004 <br /> <br />Overall Approach <br /> <br />The approach to developing alternatives for each basin was based on the use of options - individual <br />projects or solutions - as "building blocks" for the basinwide alternatives. Alternatives were <br />developed using options that have the likelihood of being preferred by the stakeholders in each <br />basin, as described more specifically below. The approach consists of the following steps: <br /> <br />. Develop options based on Basin Roundtable discussion <br /> <br />. Evaluate options <br /> <br />. Combine option evaluation with stakeholder preferences <br /> <br />. Identify preferred options and use them to construct alternatives to meet the demand gaps for <br />each basin <br /> <br />Develop Options <br /> <br />Using the lists of options developed by each Basin Roundtable, a set of "generic" options was <br />developed. The categorization of each option into one of the generic options is appropriate since all <br />of the potential projects discussed by the Basin Roundtables can be categorized into a few types of <br />projects. These types of projects could potentially be implemented in every basin, even if their <br />likelihood of accomplishing the planning objectives may vary. <br /> <br />The generic options evaluated for each basin were: <br /> <br />. Current Conservation <br />. Moderate Conservation <br />. Aggressive Conservation <br />. Moderate Conservation with Storage for Reliability <br />. Aggressive Conservation with Storage for Reliability <br />. Agriculture Conservation <br />. Interruptible Agricultural Transfer <br />. Rotating Agricultural Transfer with Firm Yield for Agriculture <br />. Permanent Agricultural Transfer with Reservoir <br />. New Reservoir with New Water Rights <br />. New Reservoir Firming Existing Water Rights <br />. Reservoir Enlargement <br />. Non-Tributary Groundwater <br />. Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Reuse for Irrigation <br />. M&I Reuse by Exchange <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Financing. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.