My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150154 Approval Letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
C150154 Approval Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 9:58:50 AM
Creation date
6/26/2007 11:19:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150154
Contractor Name
Pine River - Bayfield Ditch Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
31
County
La Plata
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Pine River - Bayfield Ditch Company <br />. May 19-20 2003 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 18c <br /> <br />concerns. First, is the unknown condition of the existing siphon to allow the sleeving process to be <br />successfully acComplished. Second, is tlie cost assoCiated with the required excavation and <br />unforeseen problems associated with this alternative which cannot be determined until actual <br />Construction begins. Third, designing the system to allow for the approximate 37 cfs could be <br />difficult, especially if a. section of smaller diameter pipe is required to by-pass some obstrucfion(s) in <br />the existing siphon. One advantage to the slip lining would be to eliminate some of the unknown <br />problems associated with excavation of boggy soils if the siphon is replaced. <br /> <br />Alternative 3, Replacement of the siphon with a new 30" PVCpipe ($267,000)- Under this <br />alternative, the existing siphon would be replaced by a new 30-inch PVC pipe, designed to carry 37 <br />cfs. <br /> <br />Selected Alternative 3, Replacement of the siphon with a new 30" PVC pipe, was chosen as <br />the preferred alternative and the most reliable .10ng-term solution. The new siphon will be capable <br />of delivering 37 cfs to the PRBDC system. Replacement of the siphon will require excavation of a <br />trench to a depth of approximately six feet. The trench will then be bedded with 6 inches of three- <br />quarter inch minus washed granular material, and twenty-foot joints of a 30-inch diameter PVC pipe <br />installed in the trench. The sides and top of the pipe would be covered with three-quarter inch <br />washed granular material for six inches before backfilling with nativemateriaJ. Several trench <br />location and alignment options will be further evaluated in the design process to address some <br />concerns about boggy soils/saturated soils. The Durango Office of the Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS) ispreparinQ engineering designs and cost estimates for the project. <br /> <br />Total Project cost is estimated to be: <br /> <br />1. Construction Cost (incl. contingency) $217,000 <br />2. Engineering Fees 50.000 (NRCS in-kind) <br />TOTAL .$267,000 <br /> <br />The implementation schedule calls for completion of financing arrangements and final engineering <br />design in June-July 2003. Construction will take place in September to November 2003. It is <br />anticipated that a Corps of Engineers 404 permit will be required for the creek crossing. This is in <br />process and no permitting delays are anticipated. Right-of-way for the .ditch is prescriptive, but the <br />three affected property owners are cooperating with PRBDC and no right-of-way issues are . <br />expected. . <br /> <br />Financial Analvsis <br /> <br />The total estimated cost of the project is $267,000, and PRBDC water is used exclusively for <br />agricultural purposes. Staff is recommending a 30-year maximum amount of $200,000 <br />(approximately 75% of estimated project cost) for 30 yearS at an interest rate of 2.75%. <br />. PRBDC has sufficient cash assets budgeted to cover its $17,000 share of the project. <br /> <br />Alternative financing sources: The PRBDC investigated alternative fina.ncing sources. They have <br />obtained an in-kind grant from the NRCS for engineering design and construction inspection. The. <br />PRBDO attempted 10 obtain other grants, but found the cuiTent ecOnomic situation had either <br />eliminated or severely decreased available grant funding.. . <br /> <br />Table 1 is a summary of the financial aspects of the project. A CWCB Small Project Loan of <br />$200,000 would have an annual.payment of $10,865 (including the 10% reserVe .requirement) at the <br />loan terms of 2.75% for 30 years. This represents an annual loan cost of $1.22 per acre-foot, <br />based on an average annual delivery of 8,866 acre-feet. The eWeB loan will be repaid from <br /> <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.