My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
NorthPlatteBasinWaterSupplyandNeedsReport
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
NorthPlatteBasinWaterSupplyandNeedsReport
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:17:08 PM
Creation date
6/15/2007 10:49:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
North Platte
Title
Water Supply & Needs Report for the North Platte Basin
Date
6/1/2006
Author
CDM
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Needs Assessment Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Section 9 <br />Options for Meeting Future Water Needs <br /> <br />9.1 Developing Options for Future <br />Water Needs <br /> <br />This section outlines the broad strategies that can be <br />used to address Colorado's water supply needs. These <br />strategies are comprises of different methods or "options" <br />that can be implemented independently or in combination <br />with other options. When several options are combined, <br />the resulting portfolio of options is termed a water supply <br />alternative. A group of individual options that are similar <br />in nature can also be combined into "families of options" <br />as described in the next subsection. Implementation of <br />the Identified Projects and Processes is critical to <br />meeting Colorado's future water demands. Unless these <br />projects and plans move forward, significant additional <br />water supplies, in addition to the remaining gaps <br />projected in Section 8, will be required. <br /> <br />As discussed in Section 8, through the SWSI Basin <br />Roundtable process it was determined that <br />approximately 80 percent of Colorado's future water <br />supply needs can be addressed via projects and <br />processes that are being pursued by local water <br />providers. Water supply options that could be used to <br />address the remaining 20 percent and the uncertainty <br />associated with the Identified Projects and Processes <br />were developed during the SWSI Basin Roundtable <br />process. This section discusses these options and their <br />pros and cons. <br /> <br />9.2 Families of Options <br /> <br />The Identified Projects and Processes listed in Section 8 <br />and additional future options generally fall under one of <br />the following categories, or "families" of options: <br /> <br />. Water Conservation, including: <br />- Active M&I Conservation <br /> <br />- Agricultural Efficiency Measures <br />. Agricultural Transfers, including: <br />- Permanent Agricultural Transfer <br />- Interruptible Agricultural Transfer <br />- Rotating Agricultural Transfer Fallowing with Firm <br />Yield for Agriculture <br /> <br />S:\1177\Basin Reports\North Platte\S9_North Platte.doc <br /> <br />. Development of Additional Storage, including: <br /> <br />- Development of New Storage Facilities <br /> <br />- Enlargement of Existing Storage Facilities <br />. Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater, <br />including: <br /> <br />- Bedrock Aquifers <br /> <br />- Alluvial Aquifers <br />. M&I Reuse, including: <br /> <br />- Water Rights Exchanges <br /> <br />- Non-potable Reuse <br />- Indirect Potable Reuse <br />. Control of Non-Native Phreatophytes <br /> <br />The options included under these categories can be <br />evaluated individually or in combination to help meet the <br />remaining water supply needs for each basin. The <br />likelihood that these options will be successfully <br />implemented and sustainable depends, in part, on the <br />public and institutional support That support is to a large <br />extent dependent on how well each option meets the <br />SWSI water management objectives. Thus, the above <br />options were evaluated in terms of their performance <br />according to the management objectives and grouped <br />into alternatives. <br /> <br />A brief description of water use in Colorado can help put <br />in context the limitations of some of these alternatives <br />that would produce additional water supplies through <br />increasing the efficiency of water uses. More detail <br />regarding basic provisions of Colorado water law can be <br />found in Section 4. At the start of the SWSI Basin <br />Roundtable process, the overriding objective of <br />compliance with the Colorado water rights system and <br />interstate compacts provided the framework for <br />evaluating potential strategies for meeting future water <br />needs. A primary tenet of Colorado water law applicable <br />to water rights change of use is that return flows resulting <br />from beneficial use of water under an appropriation are <br />"owed" to the stream, where they provide water for <br />subsequent appropriators. This tenet derives from the <br />fact that typically not all the water diverted from the <br />stream is 100 percent consumed. For example, when <br />irrigating crops, water may seep into the ground as it is <br />conveyed through the irrigation canal or infiltrate into the <br /> <br />CONI <br /> <br />9-1 <br /> <br />COLORADO <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.