My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10800
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
11001-12000
>
FLOOD10800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 2:17:47 PM
Creation date
6/12/2007 5:21:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
592
County
Routt
Community
Routt County and Incorporated Areas
Title
FIS - Routt County and Incorporated Areas
Date
2/4/2005
Prepared For
Routt County
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In an effort to develop a localized/regional regression equation, 11 stream gages, with <br />at least 10 years of record, were located and analyzed to predict the peak flows for the <br />selected recurrence intervals. The gage numbers and station names are listed below: <br /> <br />Station No. <br />09239500 <br />09244410 <br />09247600 <br />09241000 <br />09242500 <br />09238500 <br />09238900 <br />09238750 <br />09238710 <br />09237500 <br />09237450 <br /> <br />Station Name <br />Yampa River at Steamboat Springs <br />Yampa River Below Diversion, Near Hayden <br />Yampa River Below Craig <br />Elk River at Clark <br />Elk River Near Milner <br />Walton Creek Near Steamboat Springs <br />Fish Creek at Upper Station Near Steamboat Springs <br />Middle Fork of Fish Creek Near Buffalo Pass <br />Fish Creek Tributary Below Long Lake, Near Buffalo Pass <br />Yampa River Below Stagecoach Reservoir <br />Yampa River Above Stagecoach Reservoir <br /> <br />Two of the stream gages, Yampa River Below Stagecoach Reservoir (09237500) and <br />Yampa River Above Stagecoach Reservoir (09237450), were removed from the <br />analysis for reasons summarized below. <br /> <br />First, significant storage exists upstream of the Stagecoach Reservoir gages. Three <br />reservoirs upstream of Stagecoach Reservoir (Stillwater, Yampa, and Yamcolo <br />Reservoirs) hold a combined capacity of roughly 16,000 acre-feet. In addition, <br />runoff is divert~d at two locations on the Yampa River upstream of Stagecoach <br />Reservoir. The second reason is that according to USGS personnel, the soils in the <br />tributary drainage basins have very high infiltration rates and as a result lower the <br />peak flows. <br /> <br />The effects of upstream detention were evaluated for the Yampa River at the <br />Steamboat Springs gage. Five reservoirs or lakes upstream of the gage were <br />identified and store a combined volume of approximate 57,000 acre-feet, but none of <br />these serve exclusively for flood control. Through contact with the Upper Yampa <br />River Conservancy District (UYRCD), it was learned that when the reservoirs fill, <br />during the months of May and June, peak flows are also recorded at the gage in <br />Steamboat Springs. <br /> <br />As a result, an investigation was made into the effects of the upstream storage on the <br />peak flows recorded at the Steamboat Springs gage. Both the USGS and the UYRCD <br />were contacted to determine if any stage readings on the reservoirs exist, in order to <br />develop a relationship to the peak flows at the Steamboat Springs gage. Because no <br />reliable or continuous stage recordings exist for the reservoirs, other methods were <br />sought to eliminate the error associated with the upstream reservoirs. To eliminate <br />the effects of upstream storage, a log-Pearson Type III analysis was performed on the <br />peak flows in the dataset up to the time when the first reservoir, Stillwater, was built <br />in the late 19308. The predicted peak flow from this dataset, which consisted of <br />roughly 29 years of record, was in agreement with the loo-year predicted peak flow <br />from recent publications (Reference 13) and agreed more closely with the predicted <br />flows from the trendline analysis. <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.