My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10696
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
11001-12000
>
FLOOD10696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 2:02:06 PM
Creation date
6/11/2007 1:12:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Larimer County and Incorporated Areas
Title
FIS - Larimer County and Incorporated Areas - Vol 1
Date
12/19/2006
Prepared For
Larimer County and Incorporated Areas
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The floodway for the Big Thompson River near Johnstown was computed on the basis of <br />equal conveyance reduction from each side of the floodplain. Because the Town of <br />Johnstown regulates to the one-foot floodway requirement and the County regulates to the <br />more stringent half-foot floodway requirement different floodway requirements were used. <br />For the portion of the reach that flows in or near Johnstown the one-foot floodway <br />requirement was used. This section is from cross-section F to cross-section U. For the rest <br />of the reach the half-foot floodway requirement was used. <br /> <br />Computation of portions of the floodway for the Cache La Poudre River in the study reach <br />required nonstandard solutions due to the numerous divided-flow paths. In location of <br />divided flow, it was attempted to channel all of the flow into the mainstream path, limiting <br />the flow to the I-percent annual chance flood plain. If the water-surface elevation increase <br />was less than the allowable surcharge, the main flow path was encroached by proportional <br />conveyance reduction. If the water-surface elevation increase caused by the additional <br />discharge was greater than the allowable surcharge, then water was allowed to flow both <br />along the main flow path and the involved divided-flow paths. The divided-flow paths <br />were then encroached using proportional conveyance reduction until the allowable <br />surcharge was reached. The floodway was then defined as the outer limits of the two paths. <br /> <br />In areas where divided-flow paths were not present, the floodway was computed using <br />proportional conveyance reduction from each side of the flood plain with adjustments as <br />necessary to obtain a consistent and reasonable f1oodway. <br /> <br />Floodways for the revised areas of Cache La Poudre River were based on equal reduction <br />in conveyance from both sides of the flood plain. Although both O.5-foot- and I-foot-rise <br />floodways were computed, the I-foot-rise floodway was mapped. <br /> <br />In the lower reach of the study, divided floodways were developed along the Cache La <br />Poudre River and Cache La Poudre LPATH due to split-flow conditions. Just east of <br />Wastewater Treatment Plant Number 2, the main flow of the Cache La Poudre River leaves <br />its channel during large flood events. The floodway was delineated along the breakout flow <br />path. No floodway was mapped for the Lowflow channel of the Cache La Poudre River. <br /> <br />Just below Taft Hill Road, a flow diversion was modeled by subtracting the left overbank <br />flow from the total discharge and confining the remaining flow to the channel. It was <br />assumed that the confining banks fail for the purpose of computing a floodway. <br /> <br />For the revised area of the Cache La Poudre River from Wood Street to Watson Lake, a 0.5 <br />foot floodway was computed. Wherever possible and appropriate, the effective floodway <br />boundary was maintained if it resulted in a base-flood rise of one-half foot or less under the <br />revised study. The floodway was widened wherever necessary to keep the rise at or below <br />one-half foot. The floodway was made narrower in some locations because the effective <br />floodway encroachment limit was found to be within ineffective flow areas under the <br />revised study. <br /> <br />A 0.5 foot floodway was computed for Boxelder Creek and Cooper Slough based on the <br />equal conveyance method. <br /> <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.