Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Floods occurred on Spring Creek in 1902, 1904, 1938, 1949, and 1951, prior to the <br />completion of the Horsetooth Reservoir, which cuts off the upper portion of the Spring <br />Creek Drainage basin. The Horsetooth Reservoir was completed in the early 1950s and <br />has helped reduce flooding problems by reducing drainage area. Floods occurred in 1975 <br />and 1977, causing flooding in several basements, but there are no recorded discharges or <br />damage estimates available. A flood occurred on June 25, 1983, that produced 1.9 inches <br />of rainfall over 2 hours. The storm sewer that carries Spring Creek under the mobile home <br />park surcharged and water ponded to a depth of several feet. Property damage was <br />estimated in the $5,000 to $10,000 range (Reference 54). <br /> <br />A devastating flash flood occurred on July 28, 1997, on Spring Creek. Over 14.5 inches of <br />rain fell between 4:00 PM on July 27th and 11 :00 PM on July 28th, with over 10 inches of <br />that amount occurring during a six hour time period on July 28th. There were five deaths <br />and over $200 million in property damage. The discharge was estimated at 8,250 cfs going <br />into the detention pond behind the Burlington Northern Railroad just west of College <br />Avenue. This event was greater than a 0.2-percent annual chance flood event (Reference <br />73). <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />There are no structures along the Big Thompson River or its tributaries that provide a <br />major reduction in flood flows. Numerous levees along the river will contain a high <br />frequency flood (10- and 4-percent annual chance) but provide little protection against the <br />I-percent annual chance flood. <br /> <br />The SCS has constructed four detention structures in the watersheds above the Town of <br />Wellington to reduce the flood discharges of Boxelder Creek and Coal Creek. The <br />reservoirs retain runoff from a combined area of 175.5 square miles or 70 percent of the <br />drainage basin. The level of flood protection decreases, however, as the distance below the <br />structures increases. <br /> <br />There are no flood-control structures located in the Cooper Slough basin (Reference 9). <br /> <br />Although they are not actual flood-control structures, Dry Creek has several lakes and <br />storage reservoirs that reduce the contributing drainage area by approximately 13 percent. <br />The network of irrigation canals in the Dry Creek basin has some capacity for intercepting <br />Dry Creek flows (Reference 1). Douglas Lake, also aD irrigation reservoir, significantly <br />reduces peak discharges. <br /> <br />Numerous irrigation canals cross the Dry Creek channel and directly intercept drainage <br />flows, as mentioned previously. Several of these canals, including the Larimer and Weld <br />Canal Eaton Ditch), the Larimer County Canal, the Terry Inlet, the Poudre Valley Canal, <br />and the North Poudre Ditch, have large enough flow capacity to significantly affect flood <br />magnitudes on Dry Creek. For the more frequent flood events, the Larimer and Weld <br />Canal (Eaton Ditch), the Larimer County Canal, and the Terry Inlet were assumed to <br />intercept all Dry Creek flows reaching their channels (Reference 1). As development <br />within the basin continues, these canals will intercept greater flows on a more frequent <br /> <br />17 <br />