Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In 1967, the Bureau of Reclamation completed the Silt Project, located near the Towns of <br />Rifle and Silt. The project stores the flows of Rifle Creek and pumps water from the <br />Colorado River to supply irrigation water for approximately 7,000 acres of land. <br />Principal features of the project are the Rifle Gap Dam and Reservoir, a pumping plant, and a <br />lateral system. The Bureau of Reclamation turned over the operation and maintenance of the <br />Silt Project to the Silt Water Conservancy District in 1968. The district also operates the <br />private Farmers Irrigation Company facilities as part of this project. Although no <br />specific reservoir capacity is assigned for flood control, the Silt Project has provided an <br />accumulated $150,000 in flood-control benefits from 1950 to 1999 (Reference 8). <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied by detailed methods in the community, standard hydrologic and <br />hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood hazard data required for this study. Flood <br />events of a magnitude that are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, 50-, 100-, or SOD-year period (recurrence interval) have been selected as having <br />special significance for floodplain management and for flood insurance rates. These events, <br />commonly termed the 10-, 50-, 100-, and SOO-year floods, have a 10-, 2-, 1-, and O.2-percent chance, <br />respectively, of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although the recurrence interval <br />represents the long-term, average period between floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could <br />occur at short intervals or even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare flood increases <br />when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For example, the risk of having a flood that equals or <br />exceeds the I-percent-annual-chance flood in any 50-year period is approximately 40 percent <br />(4 in 10); for any 90-year period, the risk increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The <br />analyses reported herein reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing in the community at <br />the time of completion of this study. Maps and flood elevations will be amended periodically to <br />reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge-frequency relationships for <br />each flooding source studied by detailed methods affecting the community. <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses for the Colorado River were carried out by the CWCB (Reference 9). <br />Flood frequency curves for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year recurrence intervals were <br />developed based on records from five U.s. Geological Survey stream-gaging stations from <br />Dotsero, Colorado to Cameo, Colorado. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-drainage area relationships for the streams studied in detail are shown in <br />Table 1, Summary of Discharges. <br /> <br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding from the sources studied were carried out <br />to provide estimates of the elevations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. <br />Users should be aware that flood elevations shown on the FIRM represent rounded whole-foot <br />elevations and may not exactly reflect the elevations shown on the Flood Profiles or in the <br />Floodway Data tables in the FIS report. Flood elevations shown on the FIRM are primarily <br />intended for flood insurance rating purposes. For construction and/or floodplain management <br />purposes, users are cautioned to use the flood elevation data presented in this FIS report in <br />conjunction with the data shown on the FIRM. <br /> <br />3 <br />