Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lakewood Gulch and Lakewood Gulch Overflow <br /> <br />Cross-section data, Manning's "n" values, and starting water- surface elevations were <br />obtained from the 1979 UDFCD Flood Hazard Area Delineation report for Lakewood <br />Gulch (Reference 53). The starting WSELs for Lakewood Gulch were established <br />using the elevation of a 10-percent-alll1ual-chance flood on the South Platte River at <br />its confluence with Lakewood Gulch. The starting WSELs for Lakewood Gulch <br />Overflow were taken from the Lakewood Gulch profile at the confluence with.To <br />Lakewood Gulch Overflow. Values of Manning's "n" on Lakewood Gulch were <br />selected in order to model the roughness of the streambed and overbank areas. Each <br />cross section or group of cross sections was evaluated and assigned a <br />Manning's "n" value for the left overbank, the channel, and the right overbank. <br />Selected Manning's "n" values ranged from as low as 0.02 for street crossings and <br />parking lots to as high as 0.08 for overbank areas restricted by buildings or debris. <br />At a typical channel section, consisting of a natural channel with natural overbank <br />areas, the generally selected Manning's "n" values were between 0.030 and 0.035 in <br />the main challl1el, and between 0.045 and 0.050 in the overbank areas. In overbank <br />areas that were restricted by buildings, Manning's "n" values of 0.08 were used when <br />it was felt that a flow of water could occur through the developed area. <br /> <br />Dry Gulch (Lakewood Gulch Tributary) <br /> <br />Cross-section data, Manning's "n" values, and starting water- surface elevations were <br />obtained from the 1977 UDFCD Flood Hazard Area Delineation report for Dry <br />Gulch and its tributaries (Reference 12). Values of Manning's "n" used in that report <br />ranged from as low as 0.017 for streets and parking lots to as high as 0.100 for <br />overbank areas restricted by buildings. In general, areas of natural chalUlel section <br />with natural overbanks were assigned Manning's "n" values of approximately <br />0.045 and 0.080. Where buildings represented significant obstructions to the chalUlel <br />flow, they were represented in the ~ross sections as total blockages. Starting WSELs <br />were determined from the Lakewood Gulch flood profiles. <br /> <br />Harvard Gulch'l Harvard Gulch Overflow 'I West Harvard Gulch'l and Dry Gulch <br />(Harvard Gulch Tributary) <br /> <br />Cross-section data, Manning's "n" values, and starting water- surface elevations were <br />developed for use in the 1979 UDFCD Flood Hazard Area Delineation report for <br />Harvard Gulch, West Harvard Gulch, and Dry Gulch (Harvard Gulch Tributary) <br />(Reference 14). Cross-section information was obtained photogrammetrically by <br />digitizing cross sections marked on aerial photographs of the stream challl1el and <br />floodplain (Reference 54). The digitized cross-section information was <br />supplemented with cross sections taken from topographic mapping (Reference 55) <br />developed from the aerial photography. All cross sections at bridges were obtained <br />from field measurement. <br /> <br />Estimates of channel and overbank roughness coefficients were made after field <br />investigation of the study areas. MalUling's "n" values ranged from 0.015 to 0.040 in <br />the channel and from 0.035 to 0.120 in the overbank areas. <br /> <br />21 <br />