My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10652 (2)
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10652 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:46:42 PM
Creation date
5/21/2007 2:08:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Chaffee
Community
Chaffee County and Unincorporated Areas
Title
FIS - Chaffee County and Unincorporated Areas
Date
3/4/1987
Prepared For
Chaffee County
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The hazard from these debris flows is difficult to predict because <br />it is difficult to classify debris flows in terms of recurrence <br />interval, since historical data on amounts and depths of flow are <br />nonexistent 1 and because debris flows commonly change channel location <br />on the fan between events or within a single event. <br /> <br />The debris-flow season coincides with the season of maximum rainfall, <br />July through October. Most of this rain falls during intense cloud- <br />burst storms. Typically, two or three debris flows occur in this <br />area each year; however, none were recorded between 1976 and 1980. <br /> <br />Damage from debris flows has been limited to the periodic closing <br />of State Highway 162. With increased pressure for development in <br />this locale, the potential for damage and loss of life will increase. <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />There are no existing flood-control structures on the South Arkansas <br />River, Pancha Creek, Chalk Creek, or Cottonwood Creek. <br /> <br />Chaffee County has adopted zoning regulations for the management <br />of flood hazard areas (Reference 4). <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the community, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, SO-, 100-, or SOO-year period (recurrence interval) have been se- <br />lected as having special significance for flood plain management and for <br />flood insurance rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, 50-, 100-, <br />and SOO-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and 0.2 percent chance, respectively, <br />of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although the recurrence <br />interval represents the long-term average period between floods of a <br />specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short interval~ or even <br />within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare flood increases <br />when periods greater than 1 year are considered. Per example, the risk <br />of having a flood which equals or exceeds the IOO-year flood (I percent <br />chance of annual exceedence) in any 50-year period is approximately 40 <br />percent (4 in 10), and, for any 90-year period, the risk increases to <br />approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses reported herein reflect <br />flooding potentials based on conditions existing in the community at the <br />time of completion of this study. Maps and flood elevations will be <br />amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.