My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00272
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
Backfile
>
WMOD00272
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:29:16 PM
Creation date
5/16/2007 3:02:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
The Feasibility of Operational Cloud Seeding in the North Platte River Basin Headwaters to Increase Mountain Snowfall
Prepared For
US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclaimation
Prepared By
Jonnie G. Medina, Technical Service Center, Water Resources Services
Date
5/1/2000
County
Statewide
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Scientific Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION <br /> <br />Before cloud seeding is initiated, the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of <br />1969 (PL 91-190), as amended, must be satisfied. Environmental protection is a mandate of every <br />Federal agency and department. Federal NEPA requirements are described in the Council on <br />Environmental Quality (CEQ), Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National <br />Environmental Policv Act (40 CFR Parts 1 000-1508). Weather modification programs must comply if <br />they include financial or regulatory participation by the Federal Government, or affects lands managed by <br />Federal agencies. A brief summary ofNEPA issues is discussed here. A more thorough treatment is <br />presented in appendix D of a report by Sup1er et al (1993). <br /> <br />The proposed program faces compliance for the design phase, at an expected low complexity level, and at <br />a higher complexity level for the operational seeding phase. The design phase seeding will assume <br />operations for limited periods of only two winters, changes in snowfall from seeding within the natural <br />precipitation variation of the Headwaters Region, disturbances at ground-level to be minimal, adherence <br />to any special use application procedures that may apply, environmental monitoring at a high level on any <br />seeding trials, and public involvement to bt:: an important component of the program. Furthermore, <br />considerable environmental information exists for the Headwaters Region and similar surrounding areas <br />that will reduce the data collection for describing the Region's environment for various resource <br />categories. <br /> <br />In the operational phase, the proposed cloud seeding project is expected to increase the mean winter <br />precipitation on the order of 10 to 15 percent primarily over higher terrain. The variance of high- <br />elevation precipitation may be slightly reduced (naturally very wet years would be little impacted but <br />very low and low years would be less extreme). Cloud seeding would be more intensive in time and <br />spa.ce, and more seeding equipment would be installed. Impacts on the environment will likely warrant <br />additional consideration. Furthermore, there has been some prior controversy regarding cloud seeding in <br />the Park Range (more recently, as part of the caSE experiments). The CEQ regulations' (1508.27) <br />criteria for significant impacts include thos(~ which are "highly controversial" or "uncertain." <br />Environmental data acquisition must begin in the first stages of the program, and adequate data amounts <br />must be collected for compliance with NEPA policy. <br /> <br />An important limitation that the proposed project must observe, indicates that a NEP A compliance <br />document must be approved prior to any action that may affect or preclude possibly reasonable <br />alternatives to the proposed action (appendix D of Super el aI, 1993). In fact, actions are forbidden that <br />may advance the program to an irretrievabh~ point prior to compliance approval. Consequently, no cloud <br />seeding or significant disturbance of ground or vegetation can occur until NEP A requirements are <br />satisfied. However, temporary placement of precipitation and some other measuring devices can be <br />accomplished under Forest Service and/or the Bureau of Land Management special use permits. <br /> <br />There are three levels ofNEPA compliance that the program's proposed actions may need to address. <br />These are in increasing levels of complexity, a categorical exclusion (CE), environmental assessment <br />(EA), and environmental impact statement (EIS). The EA and EIS formats include (1) purpose and need <br />for action, (2) alternatives including proposed action, (3) affected environment, (4) environmental <br />consequences, and (5) coordination/consultation. Dealing with items (2) through (4) can involve <br />substantial data collection and analysis. The CE has no standard format but usually includes a description <br />of the proposed actions and an explanation of why the actions are environmentally nonmanipulative. <br /> <br />The proposed program may attempt to obtain a CE for the limited test seeding of the design phase. <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.