Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I: <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4.4 Instream Flow Issues <br /> <br />There has been an interest by local citizens and groups in the watershed to explore the <br />possibility of committing abandoned water rights to the Alamosa River for year round <br />instream flows. Portions of the Alamosa River, especially near Capulin are dry the <br />majority of the year. The lack of flow impairs the aquatic'life, and the aesthetic and <br />recreational value of the river corridor. Stream flow has been impacted by a previous <br />Army Corps of Engineer project that severely impacted groundwater infiltration into the <br />river and Terrace Reservoir operations. <br /> <br />According to Steve Vandiver (Division III Engineer, Division of Water Resources), all of <br />the water rights on the Revised Abandonment List are very junior and do not come into <br />priority on a regular basis. These abandoned water rights have little historic use and <br />have not been exercised within the past 10 years. Mr. Vandiver stated that these rights <br />would provide little or no water that would be transferable (28). In regards to using the <br />Terrace Reservoir pool that is above the current operational level of the reservoir (2000 <br />acre feet), Mr. Vandiver feels that amount of water is not enough to provide a pool for <br />instream flows much of the year. However, it is not mentioned in the water resources <br />report what the actual instream flows suggested by the citizens would be to sustain <br />instream flows. <br /> <br />According to the Colorado Department of Water Resources, there have been <br />suggestions that a new reservoir be built in the headwaters or just below Terrace <br />Reservoir to store excess water for instream purposes. There are concerns by the <br />Region III Engineer regarding this proposal: <br /> <br />1. The amount of water that could be stored is very low and would provide little flow to <br />the Alamosa River. <br />2. In high runoff years with excess water, the water is to be sent to fill valid rights on the <br />Rio Grande River; it is the opinion of the Colorado Water Resources District that the <br />. Alamosa River is a tributary of the Rio Grande River. <br /> <br />It is the opinion of the Region III Engineer that it would take too much water (4250 acre <br />feet annually) to support a minimal instream flow in the Alamosa River at Capulin and <br />would deplete a very large area of irrigation groundwater under a very senior right. Icing <br />would also cause water to leave the channel and possibly flood property in and along the <br />floodplain. <br /> <br />4.5 Stream Classifications and Standards <br /> <br />The Alamosa River has gone through a numerous changes in the past several year that <br />involved: 1) re-segmentation of the river, 2) redesignation of uses and 3) changes in <br />water quality standards. Much of the re-segmentation of the Alamosa River is base <br />upon the impact from the Summitville Mine and the results from Use Attainability <br />Studies. <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) has classified and <br />established numeric standards for all of the Alamosa River and its major tributaries. <br />Table 1 summarizes Regulation 36 of the Classification and Numeric Standards for Rio <br /> <br />4-5 <br />