My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10356
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10356
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:49:17 PM
Creation date
5/15/2007 10:43:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Delta
Title
North Fork Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Project - April 2001-April 2002 Data Report
Date
9/30/2002
Prepared For
North Fork River Improvement Association
Prepared By
CSU Cooperative Extension and North Fork River Improvement Association
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />The North Fork of the Gunnison Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Project was <br />initiated in April 2001. The goal of this project is to obtain credible water quality <br />information for the North Fork of the Gunnison watershed. This project is run entirely by <br />local volunteers, with the donation of time and services from a variety of state, local, and <br />federal organizations. Our sponsors include: Colorado State University Cooperative <br />Extension, the North Fork River Improvement Association, the Colorado Watershed <br />Network (River Watch Program), Colorado Department of Public Health and <br />Environment, the Western Slope Environmental Resource Council, and the <br />Environmental Protection Agency (Region 8). <br /> <br />This annual report summarizes the results of water quality monitoring conducted from <br />April 2001 to April 2002, at seven monitoring sites located throughout the North Fork <br />watershed. It represents the efforts of dozens of local volunteers, and hundreds of hours <br />spent preparing and analyzing samples. <br /> <br />Water quality monitoring assessed metals, nutrients, and bacteria concentrations at all <br />samples sites. In addition, certain field parameters such as river temperature and <br />dissolved oxygen were also measured. Samples were collected monthly, or in the case of <br />bacteria samples, twice monthly during the summer. <br /> <br />This monitoring information was not collected for compliance or regulatory purposes, <br />rather this data is designed to give background information on water quality conditions in <br />the watershed, help understand seasonal and natural variation in our area, and provide a <br />basic understanding regarding how the North Fork River is performing relative to state <br />stream standards. <br /> <br />Water quality samples collected by the program indicated that overall the North Fork <br />River has moderate to good water quality, given natural inputs that increase metals and <br />dissolved solids (salts) concentrations in the river. These increases are often a reflection <br />of the natural soils and geology of this area, which varies between highly mineralized and <br />highly alkaline calcareous soils. <br /> <br />Sample analysis found elevated concentrations of aluminum and total recoverable iron in <br />the upper parts of the watershed (East Muddy Creek and the North Fork around <br />Somerset), especially during and after stormwater runoff events. Selenium <br />concentrations were close to the state standard of 5 parts per billion, especially at the <br />downstream sites near the Pleasure Park. This varied seasonally. Other metals, such as <br />arsenic and cadmium, were measured only at very low levels. <br /> <br />More good news is that nutrient concentrations in the river are relatively low. Nitrate <br />concentrations never approached the state standard of 10 milligrams/liter. Although <br />increases in phosphorus could be observed after stormwater runoff events, this was likely <br />a reflection of inorganic phosphorus absorbed to eroded soil particles. Ammonia <br />concentrations have been mentioned as a concern in this area, but only occasional <br />exceedances of the state standard were observed, often around Paonia. Potential sources <br /> <br />ES-l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.