Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />1.1 AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) Safety Evaluation of <br />Existing Dams (SEED) program provides the authority for updating <br />hydrologic studies for Hoover and Glen Canyon Dams. Discussions <br />with Reclamation's Division of Dam Safety and Division of Water and <br />Land Technical Services were initiated in January 1986 to begin <br />activities related to the probable maximum flood (PMF) study. The <br />need for the study was initially identified by the Division of Dam <br />Safety when consideration was given to replacing the needle valves <br />at Hoover Dam. Funds for the study were obligated from several <br />sources, including Colorado River Storage Project revenues and SEED <br />funds. <br /> <br />High runoff from a late season melt of the snowpack in the spring <br />and summer of 1983 resulted in operation of the Hoover Dam <br />spillways. During this operation, damage to the concrete lining of <br />the spillways occurred, leading to the assessment of potential <br />modifications to alleviate the problem. As a part of this analysis, <br />the adequacy of the hydrologic engineering aspects of the dam were <br />evaluated. Additional high runoff occurrences in 1984 and 1986 have <br />kept the flood issues at Hoover Dam in the forefront. Concern has <br />also been expressed about lesser magnitude floods (e.g., 25-, 50-, <br />and 100-yr frequency floods) as they may affect the current <br />operation at Hoover Dam. <br /> <br />That same year, 1983, also contributed a record inflow to Glen <br />Canyon Dam. These record inflows caused Lake Powell to be at or <br />above surcharge (elevation 3700 feet, 27,000,000 acre-feet) for <br />3.5 months. Extensions were added to the spillway gates at the dam <br />to accommodate the high inflows and resulting high reservoir water <br />surface elevations. The spillways were operated in the first <br />non-test situation since Glen Canyon Dam was completed in 1964. <br />This operation caused severe cavitation in the spillways. After the <br />flood peak had passed, and the flood danger subsided (July 1983), <br />repairs on the spillways began. High inflows in the following year <br />also occurred. The spillways and power and river outlet works, in <br />combination with reservoir storage, were able to control and pass <br />these high inflows without damage occurring to the spillways. <br /> <br />The flood hydrology data used as a basis for sizing the dams, the <br />outlet works capacity, and the allocated flood storage/surcharge <br />space were found not to conform to the current state-of-the-art with <br />respect to operational criteria and technical methodologies. 'These <br />data also do not reflect recent hydrologic and meteorologic data <br />acquired since the original design was completed. Previous design <br />flood investigations were crudely developed'from high water marks <br />left from large historical flood events. This flood investigation <br />accounts for the effects of upstream basin development and reservoir <br />regulation, as well as the knowledge gained from many large storms <br />which have occurred over the basin since the dams were built. <br />