My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10355
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10355
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:50:35 PM
Creation date
5/15/2007 10:43:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Stream Name
Colorado River
Title
Colorado River Basin Probable Maximum Floods, Hoover and Glen Canyon Dams
Date
9/1/1990
Prepared By
US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclaimation
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />40 <br /> <br /> <br />To determine travel times for each of the channel reaches in the <br />Colorado River basin, knowledge obtained from similar basins and <br />similar studies was applied. Flood flow velocities usually range <br />between 8 and 12 ft/s; therefore, average streambed slopes and <br />channel conveyance characteristics were used to estimate the flow <br />velocities. Generally, the steeper portions of the upper basin had <br />the highest velocities, and the flatter areas around Lake Powell and <br />Lake Mead had the lower values. The channel lengths were divided <br />by the flow velocities to obtain travel times for each reach. <br />Table 3.5 shows the selected t:ravel times for each subbasin. <br /> <br />3.7 DIMENSIONLESS GRAPHS <br /> <br />The dimensionless unit hydrograph is used with the FHAR computer <br />program to calculate the flood hydrograph for each subbasin. The <br />basin above Hoover Dam includes three basic types of terrain - <br />deserts, foothills, and mountains. Data gathered from the field <br />reconnaissance and from analysis of basin features shown on <br />topographic maps were compared with similar data for basins where <br />unit hydrographs had been developed from observed flood hydrographs. <br /> <br />Separate dimensionless graphs were used for each type of topography. <br />The following three dimensionless graphs were used in the study: <br />(1) Southwest Desert for the desert areas, (2) Buckhorn for <br />the foothill areas, and (3) Uinta for the mountainous areas. <br />Tables 3.6, 3.7, and 3.8 show the unitgraph ordinates for the three <br />dimensionless graphs. These dimensionless graphs were derived from <br />analysis of flood events for the Salt River in Arizona, Buckhorn <br />Creek in Colorado, and the Uinta Mountains in Utah. They are <br />considered appropriate for use in this study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.