My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10354
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
FLOOD10354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 2:04:53 PM
Creation date
5/15/2007 10:42:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
pr1202
County
Delta
Community
Paonia, Hotchkiss
Stream Name
North Fork Gunnison River
Basin
Gunnison
Sub-Basin
North Fork Gunnison
Water Division
4
Title
North Fork Gunnison River Project Executive Summary
Date
12/1/2002
Prepared By
Colorado State University
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Project Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />channel may have been altered by instream mining, which causes incision and <br />accelerated bank erosion. Removal of riparian vegetation, bulldozing in the main channel, <br />irrigation diversions and return flows, urbanization, bridge construction, and restrictions <br />on the channel's lateral mobility have all occurred in the lower reach. The cumulative <br />impact of human activities in the lower reach appears to be increased channel instability <br />and bank erosion along the North Fork of the Gunnison River. <br /> <br />Rehabilitation efforts should focus on providing space for lateral channel <br />adjustment; reducing human activities that increase stream bed and bank erosion; and <br />facilitating the regrowth of riparian vegetation. Recommended additional studies include <br />developing a sediment budget for suspended sediment in order to quantify the sediment- <br />trapping effect ofPaonia Reservoir, and sediment sampling and cross-section monitoring <br />in both the upper and lower reaches of the study area in order to quantify channel <br />response to both changes in flow and sediment regime and human activities. <br /> <br />The next section is a response to five specific questions posed by Crane and Hyde <br />during the course of the North Fork Gunnison River study. <br /> <br />I What have we learned? <br />The results of the research conducted during 2001-2002 can be summarized under <br />two points. <br />1) The North Fork Gunnison River from just upstream ofPaonia downstream to <br />Hotchkiss has been predominantly braided throughout recent history. Aerial photographs <br />dating back to 1939, and historical records back to the late 1800s, suggest that the <br />channel has been broad and shallow, with multiple, shifting flow paths, throughout the <br />past one to two hundred years. The presence of cottonwood trees that germinated in <br />gravel, rather than finer sediments, suggests that at the time of germination (late 1800s- <br />early 1900s) the floodplain was fairly flat and had a high water table. These conditions <br />are characteristic of braided river systems. In addition, examination of the valley gradient, <br />valley confinement, natural sediment supply, and fluctuations in flow downstream from <br />Paonia suggest that the North Fork Gunnison River is likely to have had a braided pattern <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.