Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />Agure IV.2 - Values of Colorado Stream Corridors <br /> <br />Envlronmef <br /> <br /> <br />Water Qualll <br /> <br />Agricultural Us. <br /> <br />Watershed <br /> <br />Figure IV-2 ' Values of Colorado Stream Corridors, shows the variety of values placed on stream <br />corridors by survey respondents and indicates the need to broaden the factors considered in stream <br />corridor and floodplain management to insure a multi-objective perspective is preserved when making <br />decisions about current and future uses of this portion of the watershed, These values are in addition to <br />the obvious purposes of conveying water as part of the natural hydrologic cycle, including flood water <br />flows from the upper watershed downstream to the lower watershed, <br /> <br />Figure IV-3 - Funding Implementation Preferences <br /> <br />. <br />E <br />. <br />C <br />. <br />~ <br />u <br />. <br />'" <br />D <br />. <br />;; <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br />- <br />o <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />Olh" Funding M.eh' <br /> <br />Fed.r.lFundl <br /> <br />St.t,wld. Rna"'ln lOIn <br /> <br />Sp.CI.IUuT <br /> <br />Wller.h.d ....n.Dlm.nt 01 <br /> <br />Storm Orlll"'I' UI <br /> <br />Storm Or.lll.a. F <br /> <br />Flood Conuol Imprll....m.nl <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10 115 20 n 30 lIS 40 <br />Numb.r of Responses <br />(M.yh..... mor.th.n on""pllnufrom . Cot! <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Figure IV-3 - Fundina Imolementation Preferences, shows the variety of choices identified by the survey <br />respondents and their preferred choice, a statewide revolving fund loan program, There are other options <br />also identified, but reluctance by residents to increase their local tax burden apparently makes other alter- <br />natives less attractive, <br /> <br />Section IV - 5 <br />