My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10350
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10350
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:49:18 PM
Creation date
5/9/2007 4:09:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
578
County
Delta
Community
Orchard City
Stream Name
Surface Creek, Cedar Run and Tongue Creek
Title
Floodplain Information Report: City of Orchard City, CO
Date
9/1/2004
Prepared For
Orchard City and CWCB
Prepared By
Love and Associates
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />interval of interest is selected, a weighted estimate of <br />the peak discharge can be computed for a site using <br />the regression equation for the appropriate region and <br />the peak-discharge value from the flood-frequency <br />curve. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Weighted estimates are used for unregulated <br />streams to reduce the time-sampling error that may <br />occur in a station flood-frequency estimate. This time- <br />sampling error is associated with the length of record <br />for a gaging station. A station with a short period of <br />record may have a large time-sampling error because <br />its record may not be representative of the actual flood <br />history of the site based on a large number of years. <br />The observed period of record has the possibility <br />of falling within a wet or dry climatic cycle. The <br />weighted estimate of flood frequency should be a <br />better indicator of the true value because the regres- <br />sion estimate is an average of the flood histories of <br />many gaging stations over a long period of time <br />(Thomas and Lindskov, 1983). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Table 2. Basin characteristics and the range of values used <br />in the analysis <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Basin characteristics <br />Drainage-basin area, in square miles <br />Mean annual precipitation, in inches <br />Mean drainage-basin elevation, in feet <br />Mean drainage-basin slope, in foot per foot <br /> <br />Range of values <br />5.5 to 988.0 <br />7.0 to 49,0 <br />2.805 to 12,200 <br />0.081 to 0.562 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Sites near Gaging Stations on the Same <br />Stream <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Peak discharges for sites near gaging stations on <br />the same stream can be estimated by using a ratio of <br />drainage area for the sites near the ungaged sites and <br />the gaged sites. This method is considered to be reli- <br />able when the drainage-area ratio is between about <br />0.5 and 1.5 and when the two sites have similar <br />drainage-basin and climatic characteristics. If the sites <br />of interest have similar basin and climatic characteris- <br />tics and meet the drainage-area-ratio requirement, <br />peak discharges can be computed by the following <br />equation: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />QT(u) <br /> <br />x <br />QT(g)(AJ Ag) , <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />10 Analysis of the Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in Colorado <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />QT(u) <br /> <br />is the peak discharge, in cubic feet per <br />second, at the ungaged site for T-year <br />recurrence interval; <br />is the weighted peak discharge, in cubic feet <br />per second, at the gaged site for T-year <br />recurrence interval; <br />is the drainage area, in square miles, at the <br />ungaged site; <br />is the drainage area, in square miles, at the <br />gaged site; and <br />is the average exponent for drainage area for <br />each flood region as follows: <br /> <br />QT(g) <br /> <br />Au <br /> <br />Ag <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />Flood region <br /> <br />Mountains <br /> <br />Rio Grande <br /> <br />Southwest <br /> <br />Northwest <br /> <br />Plains <br /> <br />Exponent <br />0.69 <br />0.88 <br />0.71 <br />0.64 c: <br />0040 <br /> <br />The following is an example calculation to <br />determine the lOO-year peak discharge for an ungaged <br />site near a gaged site on the same stream in the moun- <br />tain region. The drainage area at the ungaged site is <br />given as 350 mi2 and at the gaged site is 450 mi2. The <br />weighted discharge for the lOO-year peak at the gaged <br />site is given as 11,500 ft3 Is. <br /> <br />1. Check that the drainage area ratio AjAg is between <br />0.5 and 1.5. That ratio is as follows: <br /> <br />AJ Ag = 350/450 = 0.78 <br /> <br />which meets the ratio requirement. <br /> <br />2. Compute the discharge at the ungaged site using the <br />specified values in equation 3: <br /> <br />QIOO(u) = 11,500(350/450)0.69 <br /> <br />9,670 tt3/s. <br /> <br />Ungaged Sites <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Peak discharges at ungaged sites can be <br />computed using the appropriate regional equation <br />shown in table 1. For sites on streams that cross <br />regional boundaries, results from more than one of the <br />regional equations need to be weighted as described <br />below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.