Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br /> <br />HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />to convey the 100-year <br />along Pinewood Avenue and the peak flow <br /> <br />This culvert does not have capacity <br />delineated <br /> <br />capacity was analyzed using the <br />flood event. Therefore, the 100,..year <br />used for the delineation was reduced by the capacity of the box culvert. <br /> <br />HY8 program. <br />floodplain <br /> <br />were assumed to be completely blocked with <br /> <br />SECTION 3 <br /> <br />For purposes of analyzing the foot bridges, the bridge rails <br />debris and hydraulically ineffective. Moser <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />IS <br /> <br />& Associates observed that after a minor storm event nearly <br /> <br />all the bridge rails on the smaller footbridge structures trapped debris up to the high water mark. <br /> <br />the capacity to <br />J.11~ pipe flow was <br /> <br />were established from guidance in the HEC-RAS model based on the pier shape. <br />coefficient of 2.6 and contraction <br /> <br />convey the <br />then reduced from <br /> <br />Expansion <br /> <br />losses at the entrance and <br /> <br />used. <br /> <br />account for hydraulic <br /> <br />was <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />weIr <br /> <br />were used <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />bridges waterway opening height than 2 feet, <br />opening would plug during a flood event. Also, the foot bridges just upstream of Orchard Road in Silo <br />Park are partially plugged with Therefore, these structures were not included <br />HEC-RAS model. <br /> <br />this small <br /> <br />that <br /> <br />in the <br /> <br />was assumed <br /> <br />it <br /> <br />less <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />sediment. <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />with <br /> <br />foot <br /> <br />For <br /> <br />3.2 ANALYZED FLOOD FREQUENCIES <br />The flood events used to analyze the hydraulic capacities of the channels <br />and 500-year flood frequencies. <br /> <br />in this study are the <br /> <br />and structures <br /> <br />100-, <br /> <br />50-, <br /> <br />10-, <br /> <br />10- <br /> <br />The profiles for the <br />Water surface profiles <br />the flow was not <br /> <br />WATER SURFACE PROFILE DETERMINATION <br />surface profiles were calculated for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year events. <br />and 100-year events are included on the FHAD drawings in Appendix E. <br /> <br />3.3 <br />Water <br /> <br />were <br /> <br />year <br />determined using the HEC-RAS program assuming sub-critical flow. <br />flow regime, the model results reported a critical <br /> <br />in the sub- <br /> <br />Where <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />water surface elevation at that cross section. <br /> <br />critical <br /> <br />The FIS <br /> <br />Since the FIS <br /> <br />Bridge pier coefficients <br />For roadway overtopping analysis, <br />coefficients of 0.3 and 0.5, respectively, <br />exist of bridges and culverts. <br /> <br />obtained from the FIS <br /> <br />the project mapping. <br />culvert hydraulics <br /> <br />was <br /> <br />100-year starting water surface elevation at <br />water surface elevation was adjusted to be on the same vertical datum as <br />did not include water surface <br /> <br />Belleview Avenue <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />used <br /> <br />were <br /> <br />return periods, <br />approximate the backwater due to the Belleview Avenue structure. <br /> <br />other <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />elevations <br /> <br />3-2 <br /> <br />Immediately downstream of Arapahoe Lake on Goldsmith Gulch lower flows are conveyed through a 8 foot <br />concrete box culvert located underneath the subdivision and Pinewood A venue. The box culvert <br /> <br />by 4 foot <br />