Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~~ <br />(, "V****. <br />t~;Vl\1C <br /> <br />l'.'orth Al1Irrkan Jnh.'rstah.' \Vr:lthl'r ;\lodific.lliull Council <br /> <br />WW\\.naIWI11C.(Jr~ <br /> <br />Concl'fning the Reintroduction of "The Wl'nthl'r i\1odilication Research ..~ Uen.fopmcnt Policy <br />Aulhori/alion Ad" in the I 10Th U.S. Congress <br /> <br />. NAIWMC is a Council ofoine slate le\'e] representatives that collectively arc spending over SI5MIYcar on <br />weather modification operations that include snO\\ipack augmentation (5 st3Ies). rainfall augmentation (4 slales), <br />and hail suppression (3 stales). <br /> <br />. A fcdcrally-spollson:d wcalhcr modification research program is needed. as recommended by a 2003 NRC report <br />on Critical /.~.W1es i" Wl'orhl'r Modification Re.w?arch and is supported by states that need a lieientilie means of <br />evalu.lting current programs and increasing their clTcctivencss through applied research. <br /> <br />. Recent droughts have produced low lake levels at lake Powel] and lake Meade and have ]ed the Colorado River <br />Seven Basin Stales 10 create cooperalive agreemenls. A separate cooperative agreement is for wintertime cloud <br />seeding in the states of Utah. Colorado. and Wyoming to pursue water augmentation to bellefit the whole <br />Colorado River Syslem. <br /> <br />. Palit and recent evaluations of the pOlential for snowpack augmentalion by cloud seeding in the Colorado Rivcr <br />Basin indicate a significanl yicld in runoff can be anained through properly dcsigned projects. A 2006 USBR <br />evaluation indicates potential for 800.000 additional AF. <br /> <br />. Federal agencies have obligations to aSliist the Colorado River Basin states and all western states in managing <br />water supplies. Weather modification operations and regulations reside within state and local governments and <br />the federal ro]e should be assistance with applied research and practicaltechno]ogy lransfer programs. <br /> <br />. Droughts in the United Stales result in an average cconomic loss of $6.8 billion per year. while severe hail <br />producing slonns result in up to $2.3 billion damage 10 crops and over 52 billion in property loss annually. Rain <br />enhancemenl and hail suppression weather modilication projects help mitigate these losses. and addilional <br />research in these areas will make existing programs even more ellcctive and pennitthem to beller quantity their <br />impacts. <br /> <br />. The impacts of global warming and inadvertent weather modification on clouds and precipitalion arc not well <br />understood. Reeellt weather modification research has provided evidence lhat air pollution is negatively alTecting <br />precipitalion processcs in cloud systems. Research inlo inadvertcnt and intentional weather modification will <br />increase our understanding of these potentially disastrous impacts. <br /> <br />. The reintroduction of The Weather Modification Research & Development Policy Authorization Act in the <br />'louse and Senate is key to the establishment of wealher modification policy and to the funding of weather <br />modification research. These bills have the suppol1 of the Family Fann Alliance. the Western Slates Water <br />Council. the Wealhcr l\.fodification Association. and a myriad oflucal intercsts including: ground water <br />management districts. water conservancy dislricts. water and sanitation districts. agricultural interests. municipal <br />and COllnly governments. <br /> <br />. The recent USBR Weather Damage Modification Program (WDMP) used a successful model for combining <br />]ocal. state. and federal resources in providing a means for scientilie evaluation of operational cloud seeding <br />projects (rainfall and snowfall enhancement and hail suppression) in North Dakota. Oklahoma. Texas. Colomdo. <br />Utah. Nevada and California. \Ve support this cooperative federal-state research model. <br /> <br />Current ~AI\\'J\IC membenhip includes statl' agencies in <br />~orth Dakol,a. Kan'ia'i. Oklahoma. Te\a'i Colorado. \\)oming. Utah. ,'\;e\'3da. and California <br />