My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10333
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10333
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:50:35 PM
Creation date
5/7/2007 4:29:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Eagle
Community
Vail
Stream Name
Gore Creek and Tributaries
Title
Hydrology Report, Gore Creek and Tributaries
Date
4/5/1999
Prepared For
Vail
Prepared By
J.F. Sato and Associates
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />or rainfall alone, or a combination of those events. A review of the seasonal distribution of peak <br />flow data was made for the 20 streamgaging stations to assist in defining the primary source of <br />flooding. The results of these analyses are presented in Table 2. <br /> <br />A total of650 station years of record were examined and about 2/3 (435) of the annual peak <br />discharges occurred during June, 188 during May, and 24 during July. Only three out of650 <br />station year events occurred outside of those three months. While floods as a result ofrainfall <br />alone could be important for small drainage areas, peak flow records show snowmelt is the <br />primary cause of peaks at the stations studied. Rainfall may have contributed some runoff to a <br />few of the annual peak flows, but it is very difficult to identify the amount of contribution from <br />available hydrologic records. During spring months, much of the precipitation that occurs as <br />rainfall will be retained in the snowpack. The ground is often still frozen during the spring <br />snowmelt season, so runoff occurs with very little infiltration. Rainfall did not result in <br />significant independent peak discharge events because the annual peaks occurred during the <br />snowmelt season. <br /> <br />The Hydrometeorological Branch of the National Weather Service, in cooperation with other <br />Federal agencies, made a major effort to identify historic thunderstorms in the Rocky Mountain <br />region during probable maximum precipitation (PMP) studies. The results were documented in <br />US Commerce Hydrometeorological Reports No. 55A and No. 49 dated June 1988 and <br />September 1977, respectively. They found that a few severe thunderstorms have occurred in the <br />mountains of Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. However, these storms are very rare and <br />precipitation data for them are sparse, partially because only a limited number of rainfall gages <br />are located at high elevations. Thunderstorm, or local storm, rainfall is a significant factor for <br />small drainage areas at the extreme PMP level, but have not been observed often enough to be a <br />significant factor at the more frequent flood levels considered in this floodplain study. <br /> <br />The best technical evaluation procedure would be to determine an independent series of <br />exclusive snowmelt and exclusive rainfall events that could be analyzed independently and <br />combined on a probability basis into an all-season flood frequency curve. This is not possible so, <br />as a practical matter, the peak annual events that were recorded at each of the gaging stations, <br />whether exclusive snowmelt or with some rainfall contribution, were analyzed and their <br />frequency determined for application to this study. The streamflow records reflect the flood <br />history at those stations. <br /> <br />Regression Analyses <br /> <br />Discharges for specific frequencies are needed for performing hydraulic analyses in the ungaged <br />reaches that are part of this: study. Discharges that were determined for 10-, 50-, 100- and 500- <br />year events at each of the 20 stream gaging stations are presented in Table 3. The computer <br />program, Excel, was used to relate discharges for each of these events to their drainage areas. <br />They were subjected to regression analyses using a log-log relationship. Drainage area was <br />adopted as the only predictor because previous studies by GAl indicated that additional <br />predictors did not improve the correlation coefficient. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.