Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Ii~ MaIrix~r,,"nh; <br />'v -..-'.....- .z:-~ <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />July 24,2000 <br /> <br />l~jl~~~ <br />~" -- <br /> <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />July 24, 2000 <br /> <br />Floods on the Roaring Fork result from snowmelt and occur principally during the month of <br />June. The flood of July 1, 1957 had an instantaneous peak discharge of 18,700 cfs at the <br />Glenwood Springs gage. This flood was the maximum of 49 years of record, and its magnitude <br />has an estimated frequency of occurrence of once in approximately 60 years. <br /> <br />In compliance with the requests, an inspection of the problem areas on the Roaring Fork River <br />was made by Corps representatives on 12 and 13 December 1957. The inspection covered a 14- <br />mile reach beginning 2 miles above Basalt, Colorado, and ending at Carbondale, Colorado, 12 <br />miles below Basalt.. <br /> <br />The following excerpts from <br /> <br />He stated that a couple of agricultural fields along the Roaring Fork were washed out and also <br />that the entire valley where the KOA Campground is now located had been completely flooded <br />several times in his memory. Mr. Lucksinger also said the Fryingpan River does not flood very <br />often but during the 1957 flood, it washed out a road 60 feet from the river. <br /> <br />the Corps of Engineers letter report also described the July <br /> <br />1957 flood. <br /> <br />The 18,700 cfs instantaneous peak discharge referred to in the Corps of Engineers letter report has been <br />revised to 19,000 cfs by the U.S. Geological Survey. This is the maximum instantaneous peak discharge <br />recorded at the Glenwood Springs gage on the Roaring Fork River through 2000. <br /> <br />Mr. Richard Lucksinger of Basalt, was an Eagle County Commissioner during the July of 1957 <br />flood and was inteT1Jiewed by the Corps of Engineers. Mr. Lucksinger said that around July 4, <br />1957, a heavy rain melted large volumes of snow, which still remained due to an unusually cold <br />spring and late summer. He remembered thatthe river rose rapidly to flood height in about 15 <br />minutes and stayed up for three days. According to Mr. Lucksinger the Roaring Fork River rose <br />high enough to wash against the bottom of the Emma Bridge, which washed out and had to be <br />replaced. Pilings for the new bridge were about 60 feet deep. During the flood, the river <br />changed course several times; sometimes going under the bridge, sometime to one side or the <br />other. The areas now occupied by trailer parks in the floodplain in Basalt were several feet deep <br />in water. <br /> <br />More than one-half of the known damages in the 1957 flood were caused to roads and bridges in <br />the area, with nearly $24,000 of damages being caused to three bridges and their abutments. <br />Two of these were public bridges and have since been restored. A third bridge, which 'was <br />private was completely destroyed and has not been replaced. <br /> <br />A substantial percentage of the total damages were due to overtopping of the low banks and the <br />inundation of pasture and croplands. The banks in most instances range form 2 to 5 feet in <br />height. In two locations, where old channel areas have been reclaimed, considerable volumes of <br />overflow and widespreadflooding resulted from bank overtopping at the upper ends of the areas. <br /> <br />Information pertaining to <br />interviews with long time <br />investigation of Flood Problems <br /> <br />the older <br />local <br /> <br />flood history of the study area came form two main sources; <br />residents and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers letter report entitled <br />on Roaring Fork River, Colorado, "March 7, 1958 <br /> <br />A common type of damage from the 1957 flood was bank erosion. The slope of the stream ranges <br />from 65 feet per mile above Basalt to 40 feet per mile below Basalt. Velocities probably in excess <br />of 10 feet per second occurred during the 1957 flood. The banks are composed largely of sand, <br />gravel, and cobbles overlain by a comparatively thin mantle of soil, and are quite erosible. <br />Spoil-type dikes, constructed by local interests with material bulldozed in the process of channel <br />clearing, proved to be very erosible. <br /> <br />3.3 <br /> <br />Summar <br /> <br />The Corps of Engineers estimated that the operation of Ruedi ReseT1Joir to fill the operating <br />storage, the Boustead Tunnel diversion and Turquoise Lake prevented $1,770,000 of flood <br />damage in the Colorado River Basin during 1995. <br /> <br />of Historical Floods <br /> <br />No urban areas are affected by floods. The principal items damaged by the 1957 flood were the <br />agricultural lands and roads and bridges adjacent to, or over, the river. A few farm buildings <br />were flooded. The total known damages in all categories in this reach amounted to slightly more <br />than $45,000. <br /> <br />No call was placed on the Colorado River at the Cameo gage by senior water right holders due <br />to high flows in the Colorado River throughout the irrigation season. Because of that, there were <br />no releases made for either Project depletions or for depletions caused by Ruedi ReseT1Joir water <br />contract holders during the 1995 water year. Highflows in the Colorado River also eliminated <br />the need to release any water to augment the habitat of endangered aquatic species in the <br />Colorado River downstream of the Grand Valley Diversion Dam and above the confluence with <br />the Gunnison River. <br /> <br />The total April through September inflow was 154,235 acre-feet, which was 130% of average and <br />greater than the reasonable maximum forecast inflow. The high inflows were due, in part, to <br />waters left in the Fryingpan River Basin which normally would have been diverted to the East <br />Slope but were not because the reseT1Joirs on the East Slope hadfilled during the spring runoff. <br /> <br />The river in the problem area is characterized by low banks, braided channels, and a <br />considerable amount of gravel, cobbles, and snags deposited on gravel bars. The river carries a <br />large bedload of gravel and cobbles, some of the latter being more than 6 inches in diameter. <br />The capacity of the channel has been reduced by this sediment. In some instances, where channel <br />changes took place during the flood, the original channels were so filled with sediment that <br />nearly all of the present flows are discharging through the "new" channels. Generally, however, <br />the "new" channels are old watercourses abandoned by the river in previous year. The littered <br />condition of the channels, and the increased danger of bank erosion, inundation, and additional <br />channel changes resulting from this condition, constitutes the present flood problem. <br /> <br /> <br />ort <br /> <br />Town of Basalt, <br /> <br />Ea <br /> <br />le & Pitkin Counties, Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />ort <br /> <br />Town 0 <br /> <br /> <br />le & Pitkin Counties, Colorado <br />