<br />
<br />Ii~ MaIrix~r,,"nh;
<br />'v -..-'.....- .z:-~
<br />
<br />Page 10
<br />
<br />July 24,2000
<br />
<br />l~jl~~~
<br />~" --
<br />
<br />Page 11
<br />
<br />July 24, 2000
<br />
<br />Floods on the Roaring Fork result from snowmelt and occur principally during the month of
<br />June. The flood of July 1, 1957 had an instantaneous peak discharge of 18,700 cfs at the
<br />Glenwood Springs gage. This flood was the maximum of 49 years of record, and its magnitude
<br />has an estimated frequency of occurrence of once in approximately 60 years.
<br />
<br />In compliance with the requests, an inspection of the problem areas on the Roaring Fork River
<br />was made by Corps representatives on 12 and 13 December 1957. The inspection covered a 14-
<br />mile reach beginning 2 miles above Basalt, Colorado, and ending at Carbondale, Colorado, 12
<br />miles below Basalt..
<br />
<br />The following excerpts from
<br />
<br />He stated that a couple of agricultural fields along the Roaring Fork were washed out and also
<br />that the entire valley where the KOA Campground is now located had been completely flooded
<br />several times in his memory. Mr. Lucksinger also said the Fryingpan River does not flood very
<br />often but during the 1957 flood, it washed out a road 60 feet from the river.
<br />
<br />the Corps of Engineers letter report also described the July
<br />
<br />1957 flood.
<br />
<br />The 18,700 cfs instantaneous peak discharge referred to in the Corps of Engineers letter report has been
<br />revised to 19,000 cfs by the U.S. Geological Survey. This is the maximum instantaneous peak discharge
<br />recorded at the Glenwood Springs gage on the Roaring Fork River through 2000.
<br />
<br />Mr. Richard Lucksinger of Basalt, was an Eagle County Commissioner during the July of 1957
<br />flood and was inteT1Jiewed by the Corps of Engineers. Mr. Lucksinger said that around July 4,
<br />1957, a heavy rain melted large volumes of snow, which still remained due to an unusually cold
<br />spring and late summer. He remembered thatthe river rose rapidly to flood height in about 15
<br />minutes and stayed up for three days. According to Mr. Lucksinger the Roaring Fork River rose
<br />high enough to wash against the bottom of the Emma Bridge, which washed out and had to be
<br />replaced. Pilings for the new bridge were about 60 feet deep. During the flood, the river
<br />changed course several times; sometimes going under the bridge, sometime to one side or the
<br />other. The areas now occupied by trailer parks in the floodplain in Basalt were several feet deep
<br />in water.
<br />
<br />More than one-half of the known damages in the 1957 flood were caused to roads and bridges in
<br />the area, with nearly $24,000 of damages being caused to three bridges and their abutments.
<br />Two of these were public bridges and have since been restored. A third bridge, which 'was
<br />private was completely destroyed and has not been replaced.
<br />
<br />A substantial percentage of the total damages were due to overtopping of the low banks and the
<br />inundation of pasture and croplands. The banks in most instances range form 2 to 5 feet in
<br />height. In two locations, where old channel areas have been reclaimed, considerable volumes of
<br />overflow and widespreadflooding resulted from bank overtopping at the upper ends of the areas.
<br />
<br />Information pertaining to
<br />interviews with long time
<br />investigation of Flood Problems
<br />
<br />the older
<br />local
<br />
<br />flood history of the study area came form two main sources;
<br />residents and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers letter report entitled
<br />on Roaring Fork River, Colorado, "March 7, 1958
<br />
<br />A common type of damage from the 1957 flood was bank erosion. The slope of the stream ranges
<br />from 65 feet per mile above Basalt to 40 feet per mile below Basalt. Velocities probably in excess
<br />of 10 feet per second occurred during the 1957 flood. The banks are composed largely of sand,
<br />gravel, and cobbles overlain by a comparatively thin mantle of soil, and are quite erosible.
<br />Spoil-type dikes, constructed by local interests with material bulldozed in the process of channel
<br />clearing, proved to be very erosible.
<br />
<br />3.3
<br />
<br />Summar
<br />
<br />The Corps of Engineers estimated that the operation of Ruedi ReseT1Joir to fill the operating
<br />storage, the Boustead Tunnel diversion and Turquoise Lake prevented $1,770,000 of flood
<br />damage in the Colorado River Basin during 1995.
<br />
<br />of Historical Floods
<br />
<br />No urban areas are affected by floods. The principal items damaged by the 1957 flood were the
<br />agricultural lands and roads and bridges adjacent to, or over, the river. A few farm buildings
<br />were flooded. The total known damages in all categories in this reach amounted to slightly more
<br />than $45,000.
<br />
<br />No call was placed on the Colorado River at the Cameo gage by senior water right holders due
<br />to high flows in the Colorado River throughout the irrigation season. Because of that, there were
<br />no releases made for either Project depletions or for depletions caused by Ruedi ReseT1Joir water
<br />contract holders during the 1995 water year. Highflows in the Colorado River also eliminated
<br />the need to release any water to augment the habitat of endangered aquatic species in the
<br />Colorado River downstream of the Grand Valley Diversion Dam and above the confluence with
<br />the Gunnison River.
<br />
<br />The total April through September inflow was 154,235 acre-feet, which was 130% of average and
<br />greater than the reasonable maximum forecast inflow. The high inflows were due, in part, to
<br />waters left in the Fryingpan River Basin which normally would have been diverted to the East
<br />Slope but were not because the reseT1Joirs on the East Slope hadfilled during the spring runoff.
<br />
<br />The river in the problem area is characterized by low banks, braided channels, and a
<br />considerable amount of gravel, cobbles, and snags deposited on gravel bars. The river carries a
<br />large bedload of gravel and cobbles, some of the latter being more than 6 inches in diameter.
<br />The capacity of the channel has been reduced by this sediment. In some instances, where channel
<br />changes took place during the flood, the original channels were so filled with sediment that
<br />nearly all of the present flows are discharging through the "new" channels. Generally, however,
<br />the "new" channels are old watercourses abandoned by the river in previous year. The littered
<br />condition of the channels, and the increased danger of bank erosion, inundation, and additional
<br />channel changes resulting from this condition, constitutes the present flood problem.
<br />
<br />
<br />ort
<br />
<br />Town of Basalt,
<br />
<br />Ea
<br />
<br />le & Pitkin Counties, Colorado
<br />
<br />
<br />ort
<br />
<br />Town 0
<br />
<br />
<br />le & Pitkin Counties, Colorado
<br />
|