Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Upper Arkansas River <br />Division 2 <br /> <br />Diversion Structure Inventory <br /> <br />concrete, significant cracking or rust, and the structure appeared to be <br />between ten and fifty years old" Structures in fair condition require <br />considerable annual maintenance to operate properly. Structures that <br />looked as if they were over fifty years old with obvious structural failure or <br />serious damage were considered poor. Poor structures may have been <br />repaired many times to remain functional, but are in need of further repair. <br />In some cases, it may be more cost effective to completely replace a <br />structure in poor condition. <br /> <br />4.0 CONCEPTUAL REPAIR PLAN <br /> <br />The basic features, visible damage, and a conceptual repair plan are described <br />in a short narrative for each structure, which can be found in Appendix B. <br /> <br />Crack Repair - There were different types of cracks encountered, with most <br />structures having at least some minor cracking. Hairline cracks are commonly <br />found in concrete, usually do not affect the integrity of the structures, and do not <br />generally require repair work. Cracks that are approximately }'8-inch to % -inch in <br />width are significant, and will usually require repair. Injecting a pressurized grout <br />into hairline cracks is generally a good method to repair hairline cracks in a <br />concrete structure. Bridging across cracks with a series of straps fastened to the <br />concrete surface is another option to slow any movement between two adjoining <br />sections of concrete that would normally require complete or partial replacement <br />rather than repair. If a portion of a concrete structure requires replacement, steel <br />reinforcement should be doweled into the existing portion of concrete, and the <br />dowels should be connected to the steel reinforcement placed within the new <br />section. <br /> <br />Stabilization - River bottom, channel bottom, and bank stabilization is typically <br />recommended in locations where the hard surface (usually concrete) of a <br />structure ends and soil begins. However, the need for stabilization will ultimately <br />depend on the type of soil, the flow velocity through the structure, and the <br />erosiveness of the soil. The potential damage to downstream soil caused by flow <br />through the structure will also depend on the setting or orientation of the gates. <br />Since the gates are frequently adjusted, the velocity of flow is frequently <br />changing and the resulting damage is unpredictable. It is recommended that the <br />material used for stabilization be riprap or grouted boulders. The designer will <br />determine the layer thickness of riprap or sizes of boulders, which will be based <br />on anticipated flow conditions and take into account factors such as velocity, <br />geometry, danger of undermining the basic structure, etc. It may not be feasible <br />to use riprap or boulders in some cases, and access to a quarry may be limited. <br />In such cases concrete rubble could be used, as long as it is of the same <br />approximate design size and layer thickness as the riprap or boulders. <br /> <br />Following the narrative is a Summary of Recommended Repairs and an <br />Estimated Range of Cost for each structure. Rather than providing a conceptual <br /> <br />Olsson Associates <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />June 2005 <br />