Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 11. FIS Update Bridge Information <br />Stream Bridge Span Width No. HEC <br /> Piers Method <br />Blue River <br /> Wildernest Road 90' 42' Norm. <br /> Pedestrian Bridge 131 ' 8' Norm. <br /> Hi~hway 9 70' 67' 3 Spec. <br /> 6t Street 103' 49' 7 Spec. <br /> Hamilton Cr. 64' 28' Norm. <br /> Subdiv. Br. 45' IS' Norm. <br /> Winegard Rd. 42' 15' Norm. <br />Straight Cr. <br /> Ped. Br. I 24' 8' Norm. <br /> River Rd. 12' 34' Norm. <br /> Ped. Br. 2 64' 10' Norm. <br /> Stephen's Way Br. 25' 28' Norm. <br /> U.S. 6 24' 110' Norm. <br />Willow Cr. <br /> Ranch Bridge 2 27' 12' Norm. <br /> Ranch Bridge 1 15' 11 ' Norm. <br /> Highway 9 75' 111 ' Norm. <br /> Subdiv. Road 17' 41 ' Norm. <br /> <br />The majority ofthe bridges are simple structures, often with single spans. The <br />Normal Bridge method was used for these cases. The Special Bridge method was used <br />for two bridges across the Blue River at Highway 9 and 6th Street. Both bridges have <br />multiple piers. The Special Bridge method provides a better estimate of energy losses <br />associated with piers, so it was used in these cases. <br /> <br />2.3 Supporting Analysis <br /> <br />2.4 Key to Cross-Section Labeling <br /> <br />2.5 Key to Transect I..abeling <br />