Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Floodplain Information Report <br />K:\35600\004\FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION REPORT.doc <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />June <br /> <br />998 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Access Bridge <br />(1828+50) <br /> <br />Assumed <br />washed out <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />u.s. Highway 36 <br />(1811+23) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />u.s. Highway 36 <br />(1786+30) <br /> <br />5387.5 <br /> <br />5399.2 <br /> <br />5404.7 <br /> <br />59 <br /> <br />690 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Highway <br />(1750+05) <br /> <br />5364.5 <br /> <br />5372.3 <br /> <br />5375.9 <br /> <br />58 <br /> <br />344 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Footbridge <br />(1743+80) <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />5329.0 <br /> <br />5340.6 <br /> <br />5342.0 <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />552 <br /> <br />Assumed <br />washed out <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2nd Avenue <br />(1729+ 10) <br /> <br />5308.5 <br /> <br />5320.8 <br /> <br />5323.0 <br /> <br />113 <br /> <br />1.2 <br /> <br />1636 <br /> <br />25% <br /> <br />Assumed <br />washed out <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Location <br />U.s. Highway 36 <br />(1662+55) <br /> <br />Invert <br />(MSL) <br />5253.5 <br /> <br />Low <br />Chord <br />(MSL) <br />5264.9 <br /> <br />Top of <br />Road <br />(MSL) <br />5267.4 <br /> <br />Bottom <br />Width <br />(fO <br />65 <br /> <br />Pier <br />Width <br />(fO <br />4.0 <br /> <br />Opening <br />Area <br />(s9.:..!t.) <br />822 <br /> <br />Side <br />Slope <br />(H:V) <br />2 <br /> <br />Blocka <br />25% <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Notes <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 1 <br />SUMMARY OF CULVERT/BRIDGE INFORMATION <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />As in the previous two studies, several culverts/bridges were assumed to be washed out during <br />the 100-year flood. This assumption was based on a visual inspection of the structural integrity <br />of the crossing by Boulder County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the consultant <br />for the 1987 FIR. The crossings assumed to wash out are noted in Table 1, summary of <br />culvert/bridge data. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Bridge and culvert debris blockage remains consistent in this re-analysis with the 1987 FIR. <br />Bridges with center piers and multiple culvert installations have a 25% debris blockage of the <br />opening area. No blockage was assumed for bridges without piers or for single culvert <br />installationso To model the blockage, the low chord of the culvert or bridge was lowered to <br />reduce the opening area. The culvert information obtained by the U.so army Corps of Engineers <br />for the 1987 FIR was used where appropriate. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />channel constructions at bridges and culverts, thus creating a damming effect. This damming <br />effect may cause overbank flow, which in turn may erode bridge abutments and approaches. <br />Where debris had collected at channel constrictions, increasing flood flows may cause a mass of <br />debris to break loose, causing a wall of water and debris to surge downstream until another <br />obstruction is encounteredo In some instances, debris may collect to the point where structural <br />capacity of a bridge is exceeded, causing the bridge to fail. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />North St. Vrain & St. <br />Floodplain Update <br /> <br />Vrain Creeks <br /> <br />Town of Lyons <br />