My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD00154 (2)
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
BOARD00154 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:45:57 PM
Creation date
5/1/2007 10:23:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/13/2007
Description
ISF Section - Notice of 2008 Instream Flow Recommendations and Summary of ISF Workshop
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />wide) and fishery surveys indicate the stream environment of Como Creek supports Greenback . <br />cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomiJs) (See CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B). <br />I <br />Greenback cutthroat trout have been identified by the CDOW and federal agencies as "species of <br />greatest conservation need". CDOW ha~ been involved in developing a Conservation and <br />Management Plan for this species (Greenbabk Cutthroat Trout Recovery Plan). The intention of <br />this plan is to increase populations and dis~butions of identified species, thereby assisting in the <br />long-term persistence of each species. The ,success of this plan could potentially curtail the need <br />for federal listing of these species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This species is <br />currently state and federally listed as "Thre~tened". <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />CDOW staff used the R2CROSS methodblogy to quantify the amount of water required to <br />preserve the natural environment to a reas6nable degree. The R2CROSS method requires that <br />stream discharge and channel profile data b~ collected in a rime stream habitat type. Rimes are <br />most easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow <br />cease. This type of hydraulic data colledtion consists of setting up a transect, surveying the <br />stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of <br />field data collected for this proposed segme~t. <br />I <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The Board staff relies upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2CROSS data collect~d to develop the initial, biologic instream flow . <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />I <br />requirements of each stream without regard! to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic in stream flow recommendations. : The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />, <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate leve1ls across rime habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, seven data sets were collected with the results shown in Table I <br />1 <br />below. Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected, the <br />measured discharge at the time of the su&ey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.